Bowsnbucks
5 year old buck +
For all of those here who are for enforcing the laws - how does that get accomplished when budgets keep getting slashed for the agencies that enforce written laws ?? Isn't that more " big government " ?? Or are we expecting folks to work for free watching the borders and bringing employers who break immigration laws for cheap labor to justice ?? How many more courts would be needed to keep additional work load off already backlogged existing courts ?? How would all of these be paid for ?? I think the breakers of those laws should be the ones fined & imprisoned - not sock taxpayers with the bill for others' transgressions.
As for being fair across the board on rules, laws, etc. - let me ask this. George Popadopoulas (sp?) got 14 days in jail for his role in dealings with Russian meetings & lying, etc. If that was an aid to a Democrat president or an Independent or Green Party president, would you be screaming for many years in prison, and calling him a traitor ?? Would you be rabidly spewing profanities to describe him ?? If a Democratic president pardoned ( or hinted at pardoning ) folks in his administration that pled guilty to federal crimes / felonies, how would you react to that ?? If your reaction would be different than the same action done by a Republican president or anyone in his administration - then you ARE a hypocrite. We should ALL be pissed when anyone breaks laws & rules just because they think they're above the law / better than the rest of us, etc. - no matter what party they belong to. Maybe if we ALL thought that way, some of the scoundrels from any party would never get a foothold at any level of government.
I agree with those here who say we have technology enough to patrol what we need watched. Tunnels, boats, etc. have been used successfully over the decades, and will be used again. A wall alone isn't going to solve the problem. Hell - the drug cartels will take care of building new tunnels - complete with lights, air circulation, etc.
Complex problems aren't going to be solved by a simplistic answer. For those who suggest that folks fleeing murderous regimes can just "fix" their own country - how do they do that with no weapons ( of any number & quality ), and even a hint of disagreement with the military dictators or drug lords gets you & your family killed ?? Whether they flee to the U.S. or any other country, I think their choice is determined by necessity - get out with your family or risk death for them.
Tree Spud & Baker - ( Just a question - not foaming at the mouth here !! Friendly question. ) What did Mitch Mc. and Paul Ryan ever support Obama on ?? ( Posts # 55 & 56 ) Mitch even stated that their main goal was to make sure he was a one-term president. How did that do anything good for our country ?? Obama proposed increased spending on infrastructure in this country, ( which has been sorely needed for decades ), but they weren't about to agree to that. Then - when he was gone, Trump & the Republicans in Congress couldn't get behind infrastructure spending quick enough. Like the idea was a novel one and one they uniquely came up with. HOW DID THAT POLITICAL P.O.S. HYPOCRACY BENEFIT THE WHOLE COUNTRY AND U.S. WORKERS / ECONOMY BETTER THAN IF IT WAS ENACTED UNDER OBAMA - WHICH WOULD HAVE OBVIOUSLY BEEN SOONER ?? Obama even joked that Republicans in Congress disagreed with his choice of breakfast food. If it's just a case of "who gets the credit" for a government action, how does that type of behavior benefit our whole country ?? ( And I'm saying this going in either political direction ). Neither side should pull that sh**. If both ( or all ) sides would look for what's best for the whole country - instead of whose political career it's helping - wouldn't we be better off as a country ?? Wouldn't great, honest, transparent behavior earn lots of votes without the corruption / stain of massive amounts of money being spent on never-ending political campaigns ??
Just read Cavey's post. I agree with a lot of it. Common sense - compromise - cool heads - smart heads - both sides take some credit. "My way or the highway" is BS and won't work.
As for being fair across the board on rules, laws, etc. - let me ask this. George Popadopoulas (sp?) got 14 days in jail for his role in dealings with Russian meetings & lying, etc. If that was an aid to a Democrat president or an Independent or Green Party president, would you be screaming for many years in prison, and calling him a traitor ?? Would you be rabidly spewing profanities to describe him ?? If a Democratic president pardoned ( or hinted at pardoning ) folks in his administration that pled guilty to federal crimes / felonies, how would you react to that ?? If your reaction would be different than the same action done by a Republican president or anyone in his administration - then you ARE a hypocrite. We should ALL be pissed when anyone breaks laws & rules just because they think they're above the law / better than the rest of us, etc. - no matter what party they belong to. Maybe if we ALL thought that way, some of the scoundrels from any party would never get a foothold at any level of government.
I agree with those here who say we have technology enough to patrol what we need watched. Tunnels, boats, etc. have been used successfully over the decades, and will be used again. A wall alone isn't going to solve the problem. Hell - the drug cartels will take care of building new tunnels - complete with lights, air circulation, etc.
Complex problems aren't going to be solved by a simplistic answer. For those who suggest that folks fleeing murderous regimes can just "fix" their own country - how do they do that with no weapons ( of any number & quality ), and even a hint of disagreement with the military dictators or drug lords gets you & your family killed ?? Whether they flee to the U.S. or any other country, I think their choice is determined by necessity - get out with your family or risk death for them.
Tree Spud & Baker - ( Just a question - not foaming at the mouth here !! Friendly question. ) What did Mitch Mc. and Paul Ryan ever support Obama on ?? ( Posts # 55 & 56 ) Mitch even stated that their main goal was to make sure he was a one-term president. How did that do anything good for our country ?? Obama proposed increased spending on infrastructure in this country, ( which has been sorely needed for decades ), but they weren't about to agree to that. Then - when he was gone, Trump & the Republicans in Congress couldn't get behind infrastructure spending quick enough. Like the idea was a novel one and one they uniquely came up with. HOW DID THAT POLITICAL P.O.S. HYPOCRACY BENEFIT THE WHOLE COUNTRY AND U.S. WORKERS / ECONOMY BETTER THAN IF IT WAS ENACTED UNDER OBAMA - WHICH WOULD HAVE OBVIOUSLY BEEN SOONER ?? Obama even joked that Republicans in Congress disagreed with his choice of breakfast food. If it's just a case of "who gets the credit" for a government action, how does that type of behavior benefit our whole country ?? ( And I'm saying this going in either political direction ). Neither side should pull that sh**. If both ( or all ) sides would look for what's best for the whole country - instead of whose political career it's helping - wouldn't we be better off as a country ?? Wouldn't great, honest, transparent behavior earn lots of votes without the corruption / stain of massive amounts of money being spent on never-ending political campaigns ??
Just read Cavey's post. I agree with a lot of it. Common sense - compromise - cool heads - smart heads - both sides take some credit. "My way or the highway" is BS and won't work.
Last edited: