Soil quality does not predict plant nutrition available to white-tailed deer

I got my hands on the publication, but I can't share it in whole on the internet due to it being in the current for sale edition of the Journal of Wildlife Management. But, I can look through and answer questions or give quotes as to some of the facts or parameters found in the publication.

They used the soil productivity index for a wide-scale metric. The link is on this page at the USDA site: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-tec...orting/soil-drainage-and-productivity-indexes
For the fine-scale metric they collected a minimum of 10 soil samples at the plants from 0 to 25cm at the base of each sampled plant.

They sampled the same 40 plant species (that were commonly selected by deer based on several previously published findings by different studies) where available (in the same genus if not, such as Rubus and Smilax) The 4 plant groups were forbs, semi-woody, shrubs, and trees. They collected tissue samples from young as well as older growth from the plant. They sampled N, P, K, and Ca because those have been shown to be the main growth limiting nutrients. The also recorded crude protein levels. They sampled in June and July across 4 years at the sites based on research showing that is the time of the year that is the most nutritionally demanding for gestation, lactation, and antler growth.

Only forbs and young semi-woody plant tissue contained the 16% CP level necessary for maximum antler growth.

1737382782848.png

If anyone has specific questions about the publication, I can post back.

Also, to note, this was published in the Journal of Wildlife Management, not just any old scientific study. This journal has the highest standards in the wildlife management scientific community and anything chosen to publish in it has undergone peer review by people that are to say the least, very nit-picky when it comes to information and findings.
 
Only forbs and young semi-woody plant tissue contained the 16% CP level necessary for maximum antler growth.
Very interesting report. A question I have is about the " 16% CP level necessary for MAXIMUM antler growth? " I've always heard 16% is the " minimum " to assure optimum health? Maybe that is just conventional wisdom I have heard.Certainly cp can be too high that without other supporting nutrients can cause health problems such as in a poorly constructed protein pellet. . Lastly if the forbs and semi woody plants are ' only ' 16% then when combined with lower cp foods the overall cp intake falls below 16% ? Just rambling thoughts. To me supports the argument for higher cp food plots and pellets to achieve maximum antler growth.......

I like the journal for wildlife mgt!
 
That chart showing soil fertility lines up pretty well with where people are harvesting the biggest bucks.
 
Very interesting report. A question I have is about the " 16% CP level necessary for MAXIMUM antler growth? " I've always heard 16% is the " minimum " to assure optimum health? Maybe that is just conventional wisdom I have heard.Certainly cp can be too high that without other supporting nutrients can cause health problems such as in a poorly constructed protein pellet. . Lastly if the forbs and semi woody plants are ' only ' 16% then when combined with lower cp foods the overall cp intake falls below 16% ? Just rambling thoughts. To me supports the argument for higher cp food plots and pellets to achieve maximum antler growth.......

I like the journal for wildlife mgt!
They were saying that only those two groups met the necessary levels, not that 16% CP was the level present in those. The CP levels were higher than 16%. They cited two publications for the 16% CP levels: "For example, only forbs and young semi‐woody plant tissue contained the 16% CP level necessary for maximum antler growth (Ullrey 1982, Harmel et al. 1989)."
 
Back
Top