I think you are giving the existing tech companies too much credit. CNN hasn't learned from their tanking viewership that they should begin reporting the actual news again. Liberals seem convinced that if they stay the course, and are loud enough, they'll get their way.I think it will eventually level things out. When tech companies realize folks have other options, they will stop bowing to one side. They will again cater to all folks instead of just 50%, it only makes dollars and sense/cents to cater to the largest customer base possible. Facebook right now has no real competition. Let capitalism do it’s thing and eventually they will change their tune. Or not, and their profits will suffer: get woke, go broke.
I will give you a different angle since I don’t know where you are or what you do. I live in the bluest of states and work in an industry that is blue. I have to listen to liberal people all the time that are so arrogant because they are always in the majority. I enjoy a couple deer websites where the majority of the people think like me. I don’t have to listen and not respond to retarded liberal thinking here, I have to do that most days. Social media is the last place you will find civil discussion. Gutfeld use to say conservatives disagree with liberal but liberals hate conservatives. The media tries their best to even up the hate. The line has been drawn in the sand. The media said on day one they would impeach Trump, and were relentless in that pursuit. They insult everyone that voted for him on a daily basis. After 5 years sorry if I don’t want to play nice anymore.I am disappointed that so many of us only want to interact with people who agree with us, or are just like us for the most part. We seem to think anyone who did not vote for (insert your choice of President) is a moron and is somehow un-American. Are you a Fox person, or a CNN person – both are shamefully bias in my opinion, and most talking heads are not worthy to be called Journalists. Now, the same thing seems to be sorting itself on social media platforms, as each is no more than echo chamber where we only hear from other users that agree with us – no one with a different point of view is tolerated, much less actually listened to. It is no wonder there is so much anger going around. I just hope enough of us can just open our hearts and our ears to appreciate what the “other guy” is going through… on both sides.
I will give you a different angle since I don’t know where you are or what you do. I live in the bluest of states and work in an industry that is blue.
There are ways to deal with an imbalance of power between political parties in a state. I know one opportunist who lived in a very blue state so he was a Democrat. They held all the power in his state so it benefited him in business to be a Democrat. Then, at one point, he decided to become involved in national politics. Incumbents had the Democrat nomination locked up, so he simply decided to run as a Republican. While his views were not well aligned with either party it was his only option. He found he could get great press coverage by making the liberal press an enemy and continually saying outrageous things. It worked very well for him.FYI… I live in the same state as you, actually just an hour or so down the lake. I am painfully aware the imbalance of power one party has in this state, but I refuse to let that make me less happy, bitter, or frustrated. We’re in the same boat Chum, I just get less sea-sick.
It did!I can guarantee 100%. that would not work in NY.
I consider myself a radical centrist.
Yes, that is the definition of opportunism.Trump was never elected to anything in NY. Nothing there addresses the imbalance of power in NY. Bloomberg, also a die hard Dem. Used his money to do a trick play to get elected then switched right back to Ind. then back to Dem. Again these have nothing to do with addressing imbalance of power in NY
Trump was never elected to anything in NY. Nothing there addresses the imbalance of power in NY. Bloomberg, also a die hard Dem. Used his money to do a trick play to get elected then switched right back to Ind. then back to Dem. Again these have nothing to do with addressing imbalance of power in NY
Those comments were for jack. He said there was an end around to deal with the imbalance. As I pointed out I don’t believe it’s possible in NY. He stated it was but never said who so I came up with two examples that in no way was an end around here in NY. If he could site an example where it worked I’d look at it.
”There are ways to deal with an imbalance of power between political parties in a State“. Was his comment.
Here I thought those were lawyers.What I was suggesting is that an opportunist deals with an imbalance of power by associating himself with whichever party happens to benefit them personally at the given moment.
Relevant to this thread and this site in general, social media may have ended up controlling messages (and all do it already), but that was never their intention from the beginning. It's happened because of human nature. Tribalism, more specifically. Social media makes it much easier to find people you agree with, which causes echo chambers, and eventually mis- and dis- information campaigns for these environments that are now much easier to manipulate.Social Media has simply increased the information control program the news started and continue today.