Really enjoyed reading this. I have been a very timid land investor, missing a lot of opportunities for both places to keep and enjoy and ones I could’ve made a return on.That is absolutely bananas. This is where the economics of hunting land lose me. I get it if someone is sinking cash into something tangible to hedge against inflation or they are speculating on a quick flip. It's a plus to be able to hunt on your investment. But outside hedging and speculation, I don't get how these economics continue to work. The opportunity cost of owning hunting land of such a high value has got to matter at some point.
The thing that goes through my head is this. What else could I do with that money? My first thought is retire, or semi-retire. Let's just take a new 2023 risk free rate of return and call it 5.4%, because that's what you can get in short term treasuries. A million bucks would kick out $54,000 pre-tax income per year, and that also doesn't generate additional costs like property taxes and maintenance,. So let's make that $60,000.
I see that as, "I can have this land, or I can have $5,000/mo in extra income. This math gets even worse if there is a finance component of any amount. Hunting land was an easy choice when I could buy a 40-acre chunk for less than the cost of a new truck. I'd take that deal any day of the week.
Last consideration is quality of hunt. Is me chasing a big buck and providing a place to hunt for friends and family worth $5000/month? Would I be willing to physically write a check for $5,000 every month for what I'm getting out of this property? How else could I entertain myself for $5,000/month?
I use a different rate of return for opportunity cost comparisons. I set my opportunity cost at $5,000/month on my place. It is absolutely ridiculous in my opinion. However, I also assign a priceless price on having land in the country, for a place to go to recreate and exercise, a place to escape the collapse of the urban cores, a place to grow food, and a way to lock in housing costs some day. Before I die, I will see the day when only be the mega rich will own private rec land in MN. The poor and what was the middle class will never get a chance to own property like this in the future. Even if they inherit it, if they're not already wealthy, that land will have a for sale sign on the road approach before they push the dirt over our carcasses.
Question for you particularly, though. As long as you don’t view the land as unsellable for personal reasons, do you not think that it would actually provide a return competitive with your 5.4% example, if you decided, wanted, needed to sell? I guess you’re being specific about actual $60k cash in your pocket for returns.
I have historically tried to buy land at a pace that I wouldn’t need a return to justify the expense. Looking back, I feel that’s been the wrong move financially. Of course, who knows what the future will hold, but I’m as bullish on rec land as ever. I’m seeing more folks buying vacant timberland that don’t even hunt. CWD has moved into pockets and those areas are appreciating as well as others. You could use that as support for saying that deer aren’t what’s pushing values in my area.
Last edited:
