I saw a podcast where the guy was talking about how good Iowa was for big bucks. He said something like only 8% of Iowa was deer cover. Our state, probably 60% - or more - is deer cover. We have long seasons, two buck bag limit, rut hunt with rifle, etc.
I think there are more factors contributing to quality deer hunting in iowa than just timing of the season. There are fairly short modern gun seasons, outside the rut, and a one buck limit. Our state has five to six weeks - or more - with a two buck limit, encompassing the rut. Crossbows are legal for anyone - for five months.
Iowa has an estimated deer population of 400,000 and they kill just over 100,000 - or about 25% of the population. So 300,000 deer are carried over one more year.
Arkansas has 1,000,000 deer and we kill 200,000 - 20% - half bucks and half does. 800,000 deer are carried over from one year to the next.
So - how does carrying over 300,000 (75%) of the herd result in more big bucks than carrying over 800,000 deer, 80% of the herd. I dont think it is nearly the result of restrictive management as it is habitat.
I think there are more factors contributing to quality deer hunting in iowa than just timing of the season. There are fairly short modern gun seasons, outside the rut, and a one buck limit. Our state has five to six weeks - or more - with a two buck limit, encompassing the rut. Crossbows are legal for anyone - for five months.
Iowa has an estimated deer population of 400,000 and they kill just over 100,000 - or about 25% of the population. So 300,000 deer are carried over one more year.
Arkansas has 1,000,000 deer and we kill 200,000 - 20% - half bucks and half does. 800,000 deer are carried over from one year to the next.
So - how does carrying over 300,000 (75%) of the herd result in more big bucks than carrying over 800,000 deer, 80% of the herd. I dont think it is nearly the result of restrictive management as it is habitat.