Conspiracy theorys, where do you stand?

Biden pardoned all of his brothers and sisters on the way out the door. These corrupts ****s were the ones getting all the money. James Biden got huge contracts to rebuild housing in Iraq. Hunter ran bio weapons labs in Pukraine. You can't make this stuff up....


View attachment 73311
Unbelievable, third world corruption. Flat out treasonous behavior.
How embarrassing for the American people…and all the money he stole from the tax payers, hopefully the IRS can still go after the money.
 
Presidential pardons only cover federal crimes, not state level crimes all the Red states should come after them with everything they have. Put all those criminal sons of b****** where they belong
 
I don’t know who the black minister was, but I would go to his church in a heartbeat!
The whole thing was awesome!

What a great day for the country.

I went to a black church one time in Texas. It sure hit different than a Catholic Church in Minnesota.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Just caught Musk's double salute. What's up with that?
 
Yeah I should've looked into it a little more. Reading that he was throwing his heart out to you but his aspergers makes it a little weird.
 
Allowing a 'conspiracy' thread(s) on a Habitat-Talk social media site is misguided.
I come here for my hobby of 'habitating', NOT to listen to crackpot conspiracies of one stripe or another.
Or to read the pros or cons of said theories.

If that is what I wanted, well, Facebook is better with a broader deeper spectrum of knowledge and interests.
I'd suggest to this site's operators that perhaps consider what the really quite excellent 'habitat/hunting' social media site --Michigan-Sportsman did.

They hosted a 'Politics' forum. Then they dropped it.
The owner didn't go to great lengths to explain the decision but.....but did say it was a distraction from his
desired mission of fostering discussions on hook'n'bullet stuff....and NOT politics, politician,
abortion, gender, religion, or the 'manosphere' and so on.
And that decision made his outdoor-sportsman site a better site.
A lesson to be learned there, I would suggest.

IMHO
 
I consider myself a problem solver so I’m gonna help you with this issue…don’t click on the thread.

I’d actually consider this thread and pretty much every single thread on this site to be extremely civil. I see no reason to weed out political stuff especially when the tag line under general discussion says anything goes.
 
Allowing a 'conspiracy' thread(s) on a Habitat-Talk social media site is misguided.
I come here for my hobby of 'habitating', NOT to listen to crackpot conspiracies of one stripe or another.
Or to read the pros or cons of said theories.

If that is what I wanted, well, Facebook is better with a broader deeper spectrum of knowledge and interests.
I'd suggest to this site's operators that perhaps consider what the really quite excellent 'habitat/hunting' social media site --Michigan-Sportsman.com did.

They hosted a 'Politics' forum. Then they dropped it.
The owner didn't go to great lengths to explain the decision but.....but did say it was a distraction from his
desired mission of fostering discussions on hook'n'bullet stuff....and NOT politics, politician,
abortion, gender, religion, or the 'manosphere' and so on.
And that decision made his outdoor-sportsman site a better site.
A lesson to be learned there, I would suggest.

IMHO

Have you considered just not clicking on threads that don't interest you?
 
Allowing a 'conspiracy' thread(s) on a Habitat-Talk social media site is misguided.
I come here for my hobby of 'habitating', NOT to listen to crackpot conspiracies of one stripe or another.
Or to read the pros or cons of said theories.

If that is what I wanted, well, Facebook is better with a broader deeper spectrum of knowledge and interests.
I'd suggest to this site's operators that perhaps consider what the really quite excellent 'habitat/hunting' social media site --Michigan-Sportsman did.

They hosted a 'Politics' forum. Then they dropped it.
The owner didn't go to great lengths to explain the decision but.....but did say it was a distraction from his
desired mission of fostering discussions on hook'n'bullet stuff....and NOT politics, politician,
abortion, gender, religion, or the 'manosphere' and so on.
And that decision made his outdoor-sportsman site a better site.
A lesson to be learned there, I would suggest.

IMHO

I deleted my original reply to you. It broke one my few rules for the forum by being disrespectful. For that I apologize to everyone. Poor example of how the site should be.

Not apologizing for calling you out on coming here and telling how we should conduct ourselves. As @Telemark says you don't have to click a link, you also don't have to visit the sight if it offends you. Lots of choices.
 
Allowing a 'conspiracy' thread(s) on a Habitat-Talk social media site is misguided.
I come here for my hobby of 'habitating', NOT to listen to crackpot conspiracies of one stripe or another.
Or to read the pros or cons of said theories.

If that is what I wanted, well, Facebook is better with a broader deeper spectrum of knowledge and interests.
I'd suggest to this site's operators that perhaps consider what the really quite excellent 'habitat/hunting' social media site --Michigan-Sportsman did.

They hosted a 'Politics' forum. Then they dropped it.
The owner didn't go to great lengths to explain the decision but.....but did say it was a distraction from his
desired mission of fostering discussions on hook'n'bullet stuff....and NOT politics, politician,
abortion, gender, religion, or the 'manosphere' and so on.
And that decision made his outdoor-sportsman site a better site.
A lesson to be learned there, I would suggest.

IMHO
 
I think with all forums and social media platforms it’s up to you on what you see. If it doesn’t interest you then you don’t click on it and it’s very easy to just scroll by ! Everything is categorized here so honestly I don’t see what the issue is.
 
A site i used to frequent banned all political discussion. Most of the time it was pretty tame as it is here but occasionally it got elevated. But it was good discussion, it needs to happen. They started banning anyone who posted anything political. Now it's become a club for a few long time members and no new signups and the site is dieing.
I don't want to see that happen here.
For the most part it's civil and light hearted even when we disagree. It is easy to take the written words out of context sometimes though.
 
Back
Top