A Trijicon would be the ticket...AccuPoint or ACOG depending. Curious how it patterns out to 100+ yards.Not real sure yet. I just sited this one in yesterday at 40 yards. It stacked 110vmax’s. Aim point is nice but would prefer a low magnification scope like 2-6.
I have an ACOG on a 556 rifle. Thought about putting it on this one. Other rifle is driving tacs though so hate to pull it off. Buying another aint in the cards. Only reason i have one trijicon is b/c i bartered for it. They make really good stuff. My eyes like the chevron reticle much more than typical cross hairsA Trijicon would be the ticket...AccuPoint or ACOG depending. Curious how it patterns out to 100+ yards.
I’ve switched to buying Accupoints for all my hunting rigs going forward. Great, great hunting scopes. This is my Fierce in 6.5 with a 5-20x50 Trijicon resting on top.I have an ACOG on a 556 rifle. Thought about putting it on this one. Other rifle is driving tacs though so hate to pull it off. Buying another aint in the cards. Only reason i have one trijicon is b/c i bartered for it. They make really good stuff. My eyes like the chevron reticle much more than typical cross hairs
The 7.62x39 has no sights yet. The 223/556 has a 3x9 scope. I have about $400.00 in each one without sights and magazines.Pics! I want pics from both of ya (Aaron too) of these builds. I love to see guns and if they involve some handiwork that is just that much better.
You won’t ever know the difference between 3x and 4x. Are they both 40mm? I don’t think you can go wrong with the slightly higher mag should you ever need it. The 6.5 has a range that’ll justify the 16x power. The only other thing I would consider is weight of the scope...which I doubt is much of an issue in this case.One last follow up question. I’ve decided to go with a Nikon Monarch scope as I really like them even tho I get a discount with Vortex. I was originally planning on a 3x12 but I can get a deal on a 4x16 for the same price. Most of my shots aren’t far and the rifle would be used 80+% of the time for hunting that is why I thought 3x12. Would the 4x16 be too much scope? When in a tree stand in the woods I usually have the scope on 4 for closer shots and 3 when I’m walking. I’m thinking I wouldn’t miss the ability to go down to 3 all that much.
They are both 42mm. The 4x16 is listed at 1.19 lbs.You won’t ever know the difference between 3x and 4x. Are they both 40mm? I don’t think you can go wrong with the slightly higher mag should you ever need it. The 6.5 has a range that’ll justify the 16x power. The only other thing I would consider is weight of the scope...which I doubt is much of an issue in this case.
If that’s the case I would buy whichever I believed had the highest quality glass and best warranty. I’m assuming in that price point Vortex wins in warranty...not sure on quality.The 3x12 is listed at 1.17 lbs