Sometimes I wear a blaze orange (or camo) hat. Sometimes I wear others or none at all. As a hunter my initial reaction is to hold my nose to hunting over a bait pile. Then I take off my hat and think, if only for myself, "wait a minute." Here in Virginia it's illegal to hunt over bait, but we have a deer season in some places that starts the first Saturday in October and ends the first Saturday in January - in at least half the state. It's followed by an urban archery season of nearly 3-months around some major high population density areas. To pile onto that, we buy deer tags in a block - five at a time. Use all of those and one and buy more.
Is this our Ohio corn pile?
My perception is, no matter where you hunt it's extremely difficult to get a buck into the desired age class however you want to define it.
So, my question - is if baiting were outlawed...and let's assume for the sake or argument and discussion...compliance ensues...what changes? I'm going to suggest that the mission to keep the deer herd in balance remains the same as it should be in my opinion. Sure, as a hunter I want lots of deer, but the number one objective of a majority of deer hunters is to harvest a deer. However, as a forest owner I want the herd balanced. I willing to accept balance. Same for being a crop producer. The insurance companies and anyone who drives wants to minimize deer-vehicle collisions for obvious reasons.
Kill deer. Any deer. So, I'm at odds with myself over the issue.
I think I will just leave it hang there. And give a shout to Roy for recycling a thought provoking thread!