wiscwhip
5 year old buck +
Since we now have county lines as our deer management boundaries and county public stakeholder committees that direct the DNR herd density management goals, the new WI deer management "model"(for lack of a better word) would be something for your OLA to look into. We heard the same complaints about enforcement and hard to follow rules, but it just doesn't seem to have reared it's head in the reality of things. If you want to know and follow the rules, you will make it a point to know and follow the rules, simple as that. If your DNR is worried about habitat differences within those counties, I'm sure they are smart enough to be able to break the land use between heavily forested areas and primarily farmland areas into useful subboundries(a road or river) where the need truly exsists, much like our Forest Zones and Farmland Zones in WI differentiate habitat changes within some of our counties. Heavily forested areas should not be managed the same as farmland areas anyway, and this would give them the tool they need to break it up into different harvest levels based on habitat. The large ag oriented areas of the state and the farmers get their increased tag numbers and kill and the larger, heavily forested areas are not overharvested, just because they are in the same county(management unit) as the nearby bordering ag areas. It isn't that hard and it seems to be working here in the short time we have had it implemented.
Where did the brassica discussion go?
Where did the brassica discussion go?