Bill Loser
5 year old buck +
If its illegal in your area i can agree. But if its not then there is nothing unethical about it.
Legality doesn’t equal morality. I’ve said this before, it’s legal to cheat on your wife in every state, that doesn’t mean it’s ethical.If its illegal in your area i can agree. But if its not then there is nothing unethical about it.
100% agree. Your ethics are yours.Most non and anti-hunters would likely consider shooting a deer eating in a clover plot just as "unethical" as shooting a deer standing over a pile of corn I'd imagine.
Ethics are subjective
Ethics define who you are. They are what your character is made up of. If you take shortcuts or cheat in sports, hunting, etc are you more likely to the same in professional and personal settings?Baiting deer is not anywhere close to cheating on your wife.
If you dont like baiting then dont, but you have no right to tell anyone else they cant or shouldn't, if its legal to do so.
A more realistic comparison would be liberals not liking guns so they dont want anyone to have a gun.
When I first bought my property, which was a camp owned by people that lived 2 hours from there and was historically unposted, I had a lot of trespassers. Most notably from the farm to the north of me. I never caught anyone but I got plenty of trail camera pictures. I ended up getting videos of them carrying AR's, which is illegal here. I debated turning them in but ultimately decided not to because I didn't want to face any retribution from them. Our trespassing laws are pretty weak, the state police are spread so thin they don't want to be bothered with hunting trespassers. Not sure how the Game Commission would've handled it but I didn't really want to make enemies in my first year there. So I went a different route. Put up a bunch of dummy cameras in obvious locations where they accessed my property and have been planting the access areas with the thorniest shit I can find. Raspberries, blackberries, black locust. So far it's worked out. I haven't gotten any pictures of trespassers since.Agreed. It comes down to who has more "juice" with local and state officials. If they golf together, belong to the same clubs, etc. - then the REPORTER of violations becomes the target / "bug under a microscope." YOU get more attention than the original violators. But ......... I know someone who was able to "even the score." He took a few dandies from their corn pile locations. It wasn't me, either, but he told me of his adventures!!! I got a kick out of his stories. He figured if THEY were going to cheat - he was going to cheat the cheaters. And he did.
No you dont have to be happy. But your ethics are yours, not everyone elses.Ethics define who you are. They are what your character is made up of. If you take shortcuts or cheat in sports, hunting, etc are you more likely to the same in professional and personal settings?
The literal definition is-
moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity.
They are open to interpretation. So as I said the law matters none to me in defining morals. They are also exclusive to each individual. My ethics say baiting is wrong. Yours may say differently. To your original point, I don’t have to be happy for a neighbor who kills a deer sitting over 200 lbs of corn.
Why would it be any less fair chase than lureing them into a "kill" plot? No difference reallyI don't consider bait as unethical where legal. Nor do I consider it fair chase legal or not.
by your analogy, if I'm willing to bait deer, i'm more willing to cheat on my wife, cheat on my taxes, and do whatever it takes to promote myself?Ethics define who you are. They are what your character is made up of. If you take shortcuts or cheat in sports, hunting, etc are you more likely to the same in professional and personal settings?
The literal definition is-
moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity.
They are open to interpretation. So as I said the law matters none to me in defining morals. They are also exclusive to each individual. My ethics say baiting is wrong. Yours may say differently. To your original point, I don’t have to be happy for a neighbor who kills a deer sitting over 200 lbs of corn.
Why would it be any less fair chase than lureing them into a "kill" plot? No difference really
Exactly right. I bowhunt public a lot. I see a couple guys on that land who use longbows and call my compound a “cheater”. A couple years ago I had a back operation and Dr wouldnt let me use a compound all fall so I got a crossbow so I could hunt and my own business partner said he would rather not hunt than use a crossbow. My property backs up to some public and I know guys who think it is a chip shot hunting on private. I killed the biggest deer of my life last year and one of them said that deer doesnt count because you killed him on private.No you dont have to be happy. But your ethics are yours, not everyone elses.
It was a hypothetical. Maybe maybe notby your analogy, if I'm willing to bait deer, i'm more willing to cheat on my wife, cheat on my taxes, and do whatever it takes to promote myself?
Wow, that's a level of arrogance I hope I never obtain.
Haha I know. I just got back from a week in WV hunting private ground over bait and I saw 1 deer. It may be easy some places but certainly not all.Some of y'all act like you just drop corn anywhere and every deer within miles just runs to it....lol
Sent from my LG-US996 using Tapatalk