No, they have the NAW "style of execution" down to a science in those segments.. Sponsor plug after sponsor plug to keep the $$$ flowing in. That is what is important to them and nothing more. The segment might as well go "yadda, yadda, yadda, ATV implement, yadda, yadda, BOB seed, yadda, killed 'em with bow XYZ". What Steve is proposing and what D&DH has the chance to do is break that mold and give back something with much more substance. The question is, can they make it work financially without the gross sponsorship plugging?i have noticed that North American Whitetail has been having a deer and habitat "management" segment on their show recently. It consists of Dr. Deer himself and one of the NAW co hosts tooling around an IL farm (a whitetail properties farm) talking about deer "management" and habitat and terrain features. Very little actual content based on doing habitat improvments like hinging, TSI, tree/shrub plantings, building waterholes, designing/laying out travel corridors/bedding areas/food plots, etc. Just more or less showing the property and ID'ing the component parts...like here is a bedding area, here is a funnel, here is a food plot.....and of course lots of product plugging. Apparently they realized a market segment exists...they just have terrible execution.
and the NAW "style of execution" is terrible....IMO. lolNo, they have the NAW "style of execution" down to a science in those segments.. Sponsor plug after sponsor plug to keep the $$$ flowing in. That is what is important to them and nothing more. The segment might as well go "yadda, yadda, yadda, ATV implement, yadda, yadda, BOB seed, yadda, killed 'em with bow XYZ". What Steve is proposing and what D&DH has the chance to do is break that mold and give back something with much more substance. The question is, can they make it work financially without the gross sponsorship plugging?
I don't think you will get an argument from anyone here on that point phil!and the NAW "style of execution" is terrible....IMO. lol
yeah i didnt think so either whip!I don't think you will get an argument from anyone here on that point phil!
Harsh, but so very true.I think your first show should be to tell the mass of followers, that buying in the wrong area of some states, will make sure they never have good hunting, no matter how much habitat or foods plots that they try to implement. I know of quite a few guys, that for over 20 years, continue to improve there properties and will die of old age waiting for things to get better.
I think your first show should be to tell the mass of followers, that buying in the wrong area of some states, will make sure they never have good hunting, no matter how much habitat or foods plots that they try to implement. I know of quite a few guys, that for over 20 years, continue to improve there properties and will die of old age waiting for things to get better.
I still believe that CWD had/has something to do with deer management in the Great Lakes States
I think your first show should be to tell the mass of followers, that buying in the wrong area of some states, will make sure they never have good hunting, no matter how much habitat or foods plots that they try to implement. I know of quite a few guys, that for over 20 years, continue to improve there properties and will die of old age waiting for things to get better.
I'm late to this party but I'd love to see a host spend 3 or 4 weekends with a random landowner, winter = hinge cutting, travel corridors, etc., spring = food plots, habitat plantings, etc., summer = stand selection and prep, fall = hunting. Condense that into one or two shows and explain how and why certain things helped or hurt that landowner's hunting.
I'd watch that. And I know of 2 guys that would volunteer 300 acres in NE KS for the common good.
I agree that location is everything but that's a tough message to sell when 90% of your audience can't move to Iowa.
Why should you care?