BenAllgood
5 year old buck +
Maybe the feeder guys next to you killing the big bucks are just going to their stand and back out and don't go to other parts of their properties.
I could see that being the case. I'm not a feeder or pile guy either. Be aware though, not all fenced properties are about feeders, killing, and big bucks. The guys that have their own private place (not for profit) will tell you it's more about keeping things out, like illegal baiters, trespassers, neighbor's dogs, wolves, government, and the always reliable "I gotta shoot it, cause if I don't my neighbor will" guys.
I don't have a fenced property, but I will say this. If I had the money and time to manage it, it'd already be done. You can make them as wild or as tuna can as you want.
Maybe. I don’t either. I should have clarified I don’t move cameras during the season. Occasionally I have to change batteries but usually only on a sunday on the way out or whatever day I’m leaving. I walk or ride a bike to my stand, no habitat work during the season, just me on the property hunting. Pretty low impact all things considered.Maybe the feeder guys next to you killing the big bucks are just going to their stand and back out and don't go to other parts of their properties.
There is zilch wild about a 100 acre farm fenced, shoot....
Have you experienced it?There is zilch wild about a 100 acre farm fenced, shoot....
Not sure what it is, but there has to be something unique about your situation that we're not seeing. There's plenty of guys who are just doing habitat improvements and getting those bigger bucks, on smaller acreages than you have, in baiting states.Maybe. I don’t either. I should have clarified I don’t move cameras during the season. Occasionally I have to change batteries but usually only on a sunday on the way out or whatever day I’m leaving. I walk or ride a bike to my stand, no habitat work during the season, just me on the property hunting. Pretty low impact all things considered.
Have you experienced it?
I don't think it's that black and white. That same broad brush would argue that protected city deer are as wild as any weary old buck in wolf, bear, and poacher country.I have walked a somewhat local one one time, believe he had like 180 acres. Not the same. I'm also envisioning the controlled environment I could do fencing off the 80 acre farm I hunt that I don't own. LOL not even the same concept as wild.
Not sure what it is, but there has to be something unique about your situation that we're not seeing. There's plenty of guys who are just doing habitat improvements getting those bigger bucks on smaller acreages than you have in baiting states.
If it’s legal I don’t see why baiting wouldn’t be a part of ones habitat strategy along with everything else.I own 350 acres with 16 different landowners who’s property touches mine at some point - most with 30 acres or less. Most of them hunt and those that do, bait. The last four years in a row, out target bucks were killed by the neighbors. Mind you, not one of them even so much as plants a 1/2 acre food plot. Some show a little trigger restraint - but other than that, there in no such thing as deer or habitat management - other than baiting - if you count that.
Last year, I said enough. We started baiting and killed a target buck. This year, we have killed three target bucks - including my largest ever. My goal in life is to increase the number of big bucks using my property AND kill a few of them. My management process was working - but It became painfully obvious I had to change my way of hunting if I wanted to satisfy both my goals. You just have to decide if you are ok with making the neighbor’s hunting better - at your expense - or if you want to get in on the action, too.
Yeah I can see a defensive baiting strategy for me but as far as hunting over it, that’s a no go for me. Doesn’t move the meter. It’s not my idea of fair chase.If it’s legal I don’t see why baiting wouldn’t be a part of ones habitat strategy along with everything else.
If it’s legal I don’t see why baiting wouldn’t be a part of ones habitat strategy along with everything else.
Sorry, and no offense, but this has been proven wrong by countless owners, land managers in nearly every continental US state that exists time and time again.
He has a valid point if trophy bucks is your goal. There are two limiting factors that you can influence to a point, nutrition and age. You need sufficient acreage to address both. The third is genetics and you can't change that without high fencing.
As far as age goes, if you have sufficient acreage, it is just a matter of discipline to let young bucks walk. Our state does not produce a lot of trophy book bucks and age is the primary limiting factor. The county with the most P&Y bucks is a suburban county with practically no firearm hunting. Deer from that county got plenty of age. Even bowhunting was limited for many years because of development.
Now we come to the real limiting factor that you can only improve to a degree. That is nutrition. You can plant food plots but they end up being a fraction of a deer's diet. Native foods comprise the lion's share of a deer's diet. You can improve soil fertility on a limited area (food plots) with commercial fertilizer and such, but that does not impact the majority of the deer's diet. It is limited by the underlying soil fertility. From a QDM perspective, you can improve the health of the local herd by plugging holes that nature leaves by designing food plots that address major stress periods. This even's out the lows and can make your deer herd the best it can be, but it is still limited by the underlying soil fertility. If you overlay book bucks with farming data (most productive soils) you get a very high correlation.
So, when you buy property that has trophy class bucks, you are buying land that has sufficient nutrition, age, and even genetics to produce those bucks. Short of this, your herd will be limited by the underlying dirt.
Thanks,
Jack
The degree to which those influences affect a person's ability to participate need to be considered. This is a very complex topic. We need to put ourselves in our neighbor's shoes.You're also using "trophy" by your calibration. Trophy can mean vastly different things to different people, and can vary greatly with areas. I hunt two main properties in the same county...expectations vary greatly between the two and what I'd consider a trophy buck is different off the two.
Sure if all one defines a trophy off of is antler inches measured than sure leave fair chase at the door, remove outside influence and lower stress and grow some incredible deer livestock. Not a flavor I desire even on sale.
You're also using "trophy" by your calibration. Trophy can mean vastly different things to different people, and can vary greatly with areas. I hunt two main properties in the same county...expectations vary greatly between the two and what I'd consider a trophy buck is different off the two.
Sure if all one defines a trophy off of is antler inches measured than sure leave fair chase at the door, remove outside influence and lower stress and grow some incredible deer livestock. Not a flavor I desire even on sale.
Absolutely! Some of my most valued trophies are does, spikes, 4-points and basket 8s taken by kids I've started in hunting. I believe SD was using term as it relates to Trophy Deer Management and trophy books. My response was in that context. My personal definition of trophy has less to do the with size of the deer than the quality of the hunt.
Having said that I stand by the post qualifying "Trophy Buck" as "Trophy Book Buck". There are many places, including mine, where the chances of shooting a buck that qualifies for a trophy book are very slim. It is not that they are nonexistent. I do get an occasional buck on camera that is probably close, but the average buck in locations with great dirt and age has larger antlers that our top 5%.
Thanks,
Jack