I could give you a bunch of reasons why I shoot a crossbow - work schedule, young kids, blah blah blah. It’s mostly because I don’t get my jiggles out of shooting a bow. I get my jiggles out of killing deer. I love killing deer.
I shoot deer with a crossbow, muzzleloader, rifle. I’d call in an artillery strike if I could save the meat. I’d use a spear if there was a season for that. I just love killing deer. If you don’t - what are you doing here.
Do crossbows give hunters an advantage over compound bows - yes definitely. I shot and wounded a couple deer with compound. Hated it. Wanted to quit bow hunting. I had practiced all summer and still screwed up.
I got a crossbow and started putting them down. Did I have an unfair advantage - probably, but I still had to put myself within 10 yards of deer (on the ground in a grille suit) on pretty pressured deer on VT Public land. I’d say that took some skill.
In Vermont we changed to a 1 buck state 2 years ago. I’ve seen more rutting behavior in the last two years than I did the previous 15.
If you want better hunting I’d say the 1 buck rule / and antler restrictions probably get you the best bang for the buck.
And as far as an unfair advantage goes - what about hunting 60 days a year on one of your private, managed midwest farms with standing corn, out of a redneck blinds - that’s unfair! That’s what all these YouTube heroes do, hell that’s what I’m trying to do! So all this unfair advantage stuff doesn’t hold a lot of water for me.
I didn't provide an extreme hypothetical, it was perfectly in line with the logic you used to support crossbows in archery season. Adding crossbows to archery season (in 2019?) allowed gun hunters in KY to go from a 15 day season to a 121 day season with the simple purchase of a crossbow. You acted like the folks who took the time to learn a skill of shooting a bow should mind their own business and pay no mind to the influx of additional hunters into the woods or the additional deer harvest. Since you dodged my question, I can't help but assume you only don't like people "telling others what they should or shouldn't do" when that something is what you want to do and less wounding loss is only a valid argument when it supports use of a crossbow.Would you be open to having a 1-day season where you choose your weapon: bow, crossbow, muzzleloader or rifle? That's the reverse extreme hypothetical. Everyone will have a "great" hunt if the argument against using crossbows is hunters in the woods pressuring deer.
If you're looking for an absolute statement, more deer were killed with a bow than a Crossbow in KY in 2021. Where is the argument against bows or the length of the bow season? If the crossbow hate is because more people in the woods, why wouldn't that argument be directed towards shortening bow season or firearms? I think it's safe to say there are far more gun hunters than bow and/or Crossbow hunters combined.
The DNRs are trying to balance attracting various hunters with maintaining or improving the the quality of the herd (depending on location). It seems like a fair compromise from all parties for the most part. Hence, that's why I don't understand the attack on the use of crossbows, in particular.
Could one make a similar claim about let off percentages? Remember when P&Y requirement was 65%? I wonder what the average is these days, like 80-90%? Awesome bows readily made nowadays that are easy to hold at full draw have probably gotten a lot more kids and ladies out in the woods. That's good right? But it probably doesn't help the quality of hunting. Less big bucks around. If that's our gauge. Illinois dnr says big (old) bucks are bad though. CWD.However, if someone wants to claim making crossbows legal during standard archery season has zero impact on the quality of hunting, i'll not hesitate to call BS.
Is keeping people out of the woods what we are going for? Maybe that standard should go to compound hunters and the same complaint comes from the Recurve hunters?Learning how to effectively shoot a vertical bow keeps lots of people out of archery season
The guy has no arms, if you think that is meaningless then we probably cant have an adult conversation about this. BTW you conveniently leave out the older generation that can't pull back a bow like my stepfather I used as an example, as well as people like myself with multipal shoulder surgeries. I still hunt with a bow, but don't practice as much because pain is a real thing for some of us.This is why how good someone can get on a vertical bow with practice is almost meaningless in this conversation because crossbows are largely used by people because they require no practice.
There is a reason (usually) why "primative weapons" seasons were kept separate from firearm seasons related to both managing amount of deer killed and pressure placed on them.
I am going to go out on a limb here and assume you hunt with a Recurve, you know, for the challenge? If you do use a compound, do you use a trigger release? Does your bow have letoff? Do you use mechanicals? Just trying to feel you out to see where your challenge ends and bombs from airplanes start is all bud.God forbid we actually make something a challenge.
I do hunt with a compound because it is a bow. It still requires practice to become proficient (I shoot multiple times a week and still am not perfect) and an understanding/skill of when do get ready to draw and get drawn. A crossbow requires very little of that. I feel that there should be some kind of investment for the trade off of a longer season where deer are less pressured and therefore still alive. I have no problem with hunting with crossbows in gun season or for folks above a certain age or with a medical condition. I also think modern muzzleloader season is a joke. It’s a single shot high performance rifle. The intent of both seasons has been lost as we seek to bend to any group who claims some form of discrimination. We all probably remember when muzzleloader got its own season…it was labeled primitive weapon season in Georgia and it was. When crossbows were allowed in bow season it was for the limitations listed above. Where does it end? Night season? I mean why not, the technology is there and god forbid we don’t let someone do something they want. Spring fawn season? They would be super easy then and everyone can win.I am going to go out on a limb here and assume you hunt with a Recurve, you know, for the challenge? If you do use a compound, do you use a trigger release? Does your bow have letoff? Do you use mechanicals? Just trying to feel you out to see where your challenge ends and bombs from airplanes start is all bud.
Hunting isn't about making it as challenging as possible for the hunter or treestands would be illegal, you could only hunt with a recurve and the season is only 1 week long with no gun season because where is the challenge at taking a deer at 200+ yards and open season for 2-3 months?
Hunting is about enjoying time in the woods with family and friends as well as putting some meat in the freezer, at least to some of us.
I could give you a bunch of reasons why I shoot a crossbow - work schedule, young kids, blah blah blah. It’s mostly because I don’t get my jiggles out of shooting a bow. I get my jiggles out of killing deer. I love killing deer.
I shoot deer with a crossbow, muzzleloader, rifle. I’d call in an artillery strike if I could save the meat. I’d use a spear if there was a season for that. I just love killing deer. If you don’t - what are you doing here.
You fully understand that hunting for some folks goes WAY BEYOND bloodlust and the thrill of killing spike horns, correct?
Could one make a similar claim about let off percentages? Remember when P&Y requirement was 65%? I wonder what the average is these days, like 80-90%? Awesome bows readily made nowadays that are easy to hold at full draw have probably gotten a lot more kids and ladies out in the woods. That's good right? But it probably doesn't help the quality of hunting. Less big bucks around. If that's our gauge. Illinois dnr says big (old) bucks are bad though. CWD.
I wish all my neighbors would agree to not start hunting until my farmwork slows down sometime in November and I get a chance to hit the woods, then we could all start together. Life isn't fair, oh well! Good debate.
Nonsense. If we agree that there are reasonable restrictions to limit hunter's effectiveness, there is likely a logical argument. Whether or not that argument fits YOUR desired balance of opportunity is another story.Everything we do is to get an advantage over the animals we pursue. This leads to better chances of success and more ethical kills. There is no logical argument to restricting the use of crossbows in favor of vertical bows.
All the arguments I've seen so far fall into two general cstegories: "because I put more effort in, it's not fair that crossbow hunters can share my bow season", or the more simplistic "I just don't like it". The first argument has nothing to do with an advantage over deer, but rather an advantage over other hunters. The second is pure egoism without even an attempt at justification. Both arguments are selfish at their core. And both are a form of gatekeeping, which is inappropriate in the world of hunting.
One main failure of the argument against hunter advantages over deer is that a hunter SHOULD take every advantage he can to get a clean kill because it is inherently more ethical. This type of argument is usually given when the technology or practice in question actually gives hunters advantages over each other.
I would always choose a crossbow over a vertical bow because I can shoot a crossbow better than I can shoot a vertical bow. I still need to put myself within archery range of a deer. And I don't think my lack of skill as an archer translates to lack of skill as a hunter. I will choose whatever available tool gives me the best odds for success, because my goal is to ethically kill the animal I am pursuing.