Jordan Selsor
5 year old buck +
Crazy!
congrats on killing that warrior!!!
congrats on killing that warrior!!!
DITTO what bjseiler said... VERY curious what kind of residual damage /scarring you find in that area when it's skinned out. Regardless, incredibly nice bucks and congrats!Yeah, definitely let us know if you butchered it yourself and if there was damage there.
Not trying to down play this buck and score means absolutely nothing to me but.... High scoring deer, not that 157" isn't (the highest scoring deer) all have two things in common. Tine length and well tines. This buck has nice ones, twos, and threes but is lacking on fours. Again not trying to take anything away from it. It is substantially larger than any buck iv'e ever put my tag on.I'm not great at scoring deer just by looking at him, but if he only goes 157" color me surprised.That's a stud.He certainly has the "wow" factor.
Congrats on killing a stud
Not trying to down play this buck and score means absolutely nothing to me but.... High scoring deer, not that 157" isn't (the highest scoring deer) all have two things in common. Tine length and well tines. This buck has nice ones, twos, and threes but is lacking on fours. Again not trying to take anything away from it. It is substantially larger than any buck iv'e ever put my tag on.
Generally to get a truly high scoring typical buck you're going to need some long fours. It just goes to show how hard it is to get an established age class and then on top of age have the genetics to pump out some Booners. They are just not that common to say the least.
Congratulations on a great buck with an even better story behind him. I have to assume that if not for that wound this buck would have grossed another 10+" but who knows.
Not offended at all. Like I said, i'm not great at it. but i'm getting better.Not trying to down play this buck and score means absolutely nothing to me but.... High scoring deer, not that 157" isn't (the highest scoring deer) all have two things in common. Tine length and well tines. This buck has nice ones, twos, and threes but is lacking on fours. Again not trying to take anything away from it. It is substantially larger than any buck iv'e ever put my tag on.
Generally to get a truly high scoring typical buck you're going to need some long fours. It just goes to show how hard it is to get an established age class and then on top of age have the genetics to pump out some Booners. They are just not that common to say the least.
Congratulations on a great buck with an even better story behind him. I have to assume that if not for that wound this buck would have grossed another 10+" but who knows.
That's a very cool graphic. I like that.
He fits the age structure we are after and that’s what’s most important.
Well, unfortunately I’ve only got one neighbor (who owns only 40 acres) who’s fully vested in the mission. His brother in law who borders my north side puts heavy pressure on and any 125” 2.5 year is getting whacked. My good neighbor is trying to work on him...but I don’t have much faith. I’m going to try and lease the 200 to my east. And 250 to my southwest. If I had those 650 acres plus my good neighbors 40 I would feel a lot better about the nice young bucks surviving the orange army.My neighbor and I just had this conversation after sharing pics of deer we have passed and want. (Yes I’m really lucky in the neighbors dept). We decided, we want to shoot a hamster. Just a 220 lbs hamster.
Well...no way to DNA test pictures but my neighbor followed him through recovery so we are confident it’s the same deer. The rack traits aren’t seen on any other deer we haveThe recovery he made is amazing, are you sure it is the same deer and not his twin brother?