The Univ of Michigan piece is especially useful. The bold material in the vertical rectangle on the left also identifies news source bias (4th item down).
Do you suppose there could be a right leaning/conservative web site that was anti-Trump?
Anti-trump bulwark ….
https://thebulwark.com/america-is-hostage-to-trumps-narratives/
From Bulwark ....
"It’s difficult to define an exact cause for Breitbart’s precipitous drop in audience, although veteran conservative journalist Jim Swift points to the poor quality of the content. “It’s not that Breitbart employs really good thinkers or fantastic writers,” says
Swift, who now works at The Bulwark, a conservative website with pronounced anti-Trump sentiments that was launched early this year by several former Weekly Standard staffers. “Why would you want to read a bunch of no-name writers when you can get pro-Trump news from much better writers?”
A lot of good posts on this thread deal directly with managing the virus e.g., social distancing and vaccines, and pharmacy products. To avoid distracting from those worthwhile efforts, I thought a new thread dealing with the management of the response might be a topic that will be relevant for months to come. Obviously, the two themes are related. If there is no interest, I - like others - will post on the existing thread.
