Conspiracy theorys, where do you stand?

[Jerry-B-WI]

Noem and Bondi are both borderline imbeciles that have been pampered and failed up their whole lives….just like far too many women in this country(40-60% imo), regardless of their politics.

You mean they may have been DEI?

 

[Howboutthemdawgs]

You mean they may have been DEI?

1000000%

 

[bwoods11]

Pete Hegseth is great in my opinion. We needed to revert back to a real military after watching cross dressers & a deserter try to run our military in the last administration.

He’s extremely bright (valedictorian) in a large high school in Minnesota. Ivy League graduate.

US military performance has been unbelievable since he’s been in charge !

 

[Brian662]

Seeing some speculation Bondi was shown the door before she was deposed by the committee on Epstein.

 

[Howboutthemdawgs]

Seeing some speculation Bondi was shown the door before she was deposed by the committee on Epstein.

I genuinely don’t know the answer, but does her unemployment save her from a deposition?

 

[Jerry-B-WI]

I genuinely don’t know the answer, but does her unemployment save her from a deposition?

Nancy Mace claims the deposition was written for Pam Bondi and not the Attorney General. Don't know if she's off the hook or not.
I think we'd all like to see justice done with the Epstein files.

 

[somich]

I genuinely don’t know the answer, but does her unemployment save her from a deposition?

The dems announced that she will still be expected to depose on the epstein situation. They did nothing for 4 years and now pretend to care.

 

[Brian662]

I genuinely don’t know the answer, but does her unemployment save her from a deposition?

I have no idea either. I have to assume if you're out of the position, you're out of the responsibilities of the position.

 

[Brian662]

The dems announced that she will still be expected to depose on the epstein situation. They did nothing for 4 years and now pretend to care.

You think Epstein is a partisan issue?

 

[somich]

You think Epstein is a partisan issue?

I'm positive that the dems didn't care about digging into anything for four years. I don't think many republicans do either, it opens too many sores in the washington elites on both sides. There's also lots of NDAs from and for lots of people to get any real answers.

 

[Brian662]

I'm positive that the dems didn't care about digging into anything for four years. I don't think many republicans do either, it opens too many sores in the washington elites on both sides. There's also lots of NDAs form and for lots of people to get any real answers.

I keep seeing people here say this about the Dems, which may be true...but why would it be true? The Clintons already gave their depositions, who else has been called on it? Any idea who else the Dems would have been trying to protect if this were true?

Trump campaigned on releasing the files, they had a 'made-for-TV' release party with all the inner circle folks. The files sat on Bondi's desk for months. Trump was told by Bondi he was in the files, they moved to stifle the release. Slandered Massie. Called it a Dem Hoax. The Speaker of the House claimed Trump was an informant. The Espstein files Act passed, Trump was forced to sign it, turns out he was named somewhere north of 38,000 times. Bondi redacted the settlement that the Epstein estate paid to Jane Doe #4, who accused Trump and Epstein of sexual assault, whom the FBI found credible.

These are just some of the things we know happened in the past ~8 months. To your point, who knows how much more could be covered up under NDA's, reductions, etc.

I personally don't care whether anyone has a D or R next to their name, if they deserve to be investigated for their dealings with Epstein, they certainly should be. I'd guess a large majority of the American public agrees.

 

[Brian662]

 

[somich]

I keep seeing people here say this about the Dems, which may be true...but why would it be true? The Clintons already gave their depositions, who else has been called on it? Any idea who else the Dems would have been trying to protect if this were true?

Trump campaigned on releasing the files, they had a 'made-for-TV' release party with all the inner circle folks. The files sat on Bondi's desk for months. Trump was told by Bondi he was in the files, they moved to stifle the release. Slandered Massie. Called it a Dem Hoax. The Speaker of the House claimed Trump was an informant. The Espstein files Act passed, Trump was forced to sign it, turns out he was named somewhere north of 38,000 times. Bondi redacted the settlement that the Epstein estate paid to Jane Doe #4, who accused Trump and Epstein of sexual assault, whom the FBI found credible.

These are just some of the things we know happened in the past ~8 months. To your point, who knows how much more could be covered up under NDA's, reductions, etc.

I personally don't care whether anyone has a D or R next to their name, if they deserve to be investigated for their dealings with Epstein, they certainly should be. I'd guess a large majority of the American public agrees.

I said dems because if they cared about the Epstein case, they'd have done, something, in the 4 years, they didn't because they don't. It's only a political bitch for them.

For the republicans, several cared during the campaign as a gotcha because they new Trump was clean and hoped to get some dems. After the election they likely found out nothing could come out because of NDAs and the web of corruption designed to keep such things from coming with ruining many people.

That's my take anyway. Nothing of significance was ever going to be allowed to come out.

 

[Howboutthemdawgs]

View attachment 91169

Patel and Dan b were all law and order Epstein hawks prior to joining the administration. Listen to their podcast appearances and interviews. I have no clue about bondi but Im sure she was too. So what changed? You think they just realized it was just a witch hunt and all fabricated, or the one person on the planet who could get them to shut up made them shut up?

 

[Brian662]

I said dems because if they cared about the Epstein case, they'd have done, something, in the 4 years, they didn't because they don't. It's only a political bitch for them.

For the republicans, several cared during the campaign as a gotcha because they new Trump was clean and hoped to get some dems. After the election they likely found out nothing could come out because of NDAs and the web of corruption designed to keep such things from coming with ruining many people.

That's my take anyway. Nothing of significance was ever going to be allowed to come out.

Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal in the 2nd US circuit court ended in September of 2024. It is customary for evidence to not be made public while court cases are pending.

Republicans controlled the House 2023-2025, mostly the same bunch who control it now and authored/passed the Epstein Transparency Act (bi-partisan).

"Knew Trump was clean" may be the funniest thing I've ever read in regards to the Epstein stuff.

My take is our nation is so unjustifiably crooked that nobody of any wealth (everyone in the files) will ever be held accountable for trafficking and raping little girls. I am embarrassed how other countries have taken steps to investigate those named and we just act like there is nothing we can do. This is not a R or D problem. It's an American problem.

 

[Brian662]

Patel and Dan b were all law and order Epstein hawks prior to joining the administration. Listen to their podcast appearances and interviews. I have no clue about bondi but Im sure she was too. So what changed? You think they just realized it was just a witch hunt and all fabricated, or the one person on the planet who could get them to shut up made them shut up?

Here's your answer on Bondi from an old campaign video. Used to talk the same talk as Kash and Dan B. I remember them getting interviewed and saying unequivocally that Epstein killed himself because "we've seen all the evidence". Funny how that's all changed now.

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[somich]

Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal in the 2nd US circuit court ended in September of 2024. It is customary for evidence to not be made public while court cases are pending.

Republicans controlled the House 2023-2025, mostly the same bunch who control it now and authored/passed the Epstein Transparency Act (bi-partisan).

"Knew Trump was clean" may be the funniest thing I've ever read in regards to the Epstein stuff.

My take is our nation is so unjustifiably crooked that nobody of any wealth (everyone in the files) will ever be held accountable for trafficking and raping little girls. I am embarrassed how other countries have taken steps to investigate those named and we just act like there is nothing we can do. This is not a R or D problem. It's an American problem.

If there had been anything on Trump the dems would have attacked fullbore.

They made up obviously fake and proven fake for years.

So, again, if there was anything on him, they would have.

 

[Jerry-B-WI]

Patel and Dan b were all law and order Epstein hawks prior to joining the administration. Listen to their podcast appearances and interviews. I have no clue about bondi but Im sure she was too. So what changed? You think they just realized it was just a witch hunt and all fabricated, or the one person on the planet who could get them to shut up made them shut up?

If Patel and Bongino were respecful people no one would be able to shut them up about the Epstein files. They were blowing allot of smoke up people's asses until they found out how the system really works.

 

[Brian662]

If there had been anything on Trump the dems would have attacked fullbore.

They made up obviously fake and proven fake for years.

So, again, if there was anything on him, they would have.

The Epstein estate paid a settlement to a girl who accused him of sexual assault when she was 13. The same girl accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was 15. The FBI deemed her credible. The AG who just got fired covered it up when the files were first released.

Accusation, settlement, credible witness, cover-up

Sounds fake

 

[SD51555]

Israel is not an enemy to Lebanese Christians. Christianity was the dominant religion by far in Lebanon until wave after wave of Muslims starved out Christians and waged war against them. And who were the latest group of Muslims to attack Christians and Jews in Lebanon? Ah yes, the Palestinians.

Israel is perfectly capable of living in peace with any peaceful neighbor. Israel is in a fight for its existence from enemies whose stated goal is the extermination of Jews from the planet.

It seems your bias against The Evil Jooz is blinding you to historical facts, or you are deliberately ignoring important facts in order to blame the Jews/Israelis for the problems in the Middle East.

Your narrative only works if we willingly ignore facts and use a sliding scale of justice. The Israelis have every right and obligation to protect themselves. They are NOT targeting Christians in Lebanon. They are targeting Muslim jihadis who are the self-declared enemies of Israelis/Jews/Christians.

There is no other nation on Earth that is denied the right to defend itself from another nation because Christians live there. In fact, Israel is fighting the enemies of the Christians. Israel has always allied with the Lebanese Christians against the Palestinians in Lebanon. Your desire to somehow twist this into Jews vs. Christians requires some serious mental gymnastics and ignoring current and historical facts.

Remember that Americans killed a lot of Christians in Europe, and are currently helping to kill Christians in Ukraine. Where's your bleeding heart for the Ukrainian and Russian Orthodox Christians dying in Europe?

I know that’s the anthem in the media, but no person on earth should be able to pre-pardon themselves by saying “I have a right to exist” and then go on to kill millions of people with no investigation, oversight, or trial.

It’s been a while since I’ve talked about the Russia Ukraine war, and especially that one, I have been equally consistent there. My point has been the US state department will side with any non-Christian group on earth to fight Christians, including our own troops.

In Ukraine, the state department and the EU and Lindsey graham have chosen to arm the nazis in the azov battalion to fight the Russians and kidnap Ukrainian Christian conscripts inside Ukraine and feed them into the wood chipper. Been against that conflict since the beginning.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk