Jerry-B-WI
5 year old buck +
You mean they may have been DEI?
-
If you are posting pictures, and they aren't posting in the correct orientation, please flush your browser cache and try again.
Edge
Safari/iOS
Chrome
Conspiracy theorys, where do you stand?
- Thread starter 4wanderingeyes
- Start date
Howboutthemdawgs
5 year old buck +
1000000%
bwoods11
5 year old buck +
Pete Hegseth is great in my opinion. We needed to revert back to a real military after watching cross dressers & a deserter try to run our military in the last administration.
He’s extremely bright (valedictorian) in a large high school in Minnesota. Ivy League graduate.
US military performance has been unbelievable since he’s been in charge !
He’s extremely bright (valedictorian) in a large high school in Minnesota. Ivy League graduate.
US military performance has been unbelievable since he’s been in charge !
Last edited:
Howboutthemdawgs
5 year old buck +
I genuinely don’t know the answer, but does her unemployment save her from a deposition?
Jerry-B-WI
5 year old buck +
Nancy Mace claims the deposition was written for Pam Bondi and not the Attorney General. Don't know if she's off the hook or not.
I think we'd all like to see justice done with the Epstein files.
The dems announced that she will still be expected to depose on the epstein situation. They did nothing for 4 years and now pretend to care.
Brian662
5 year old buck +
I have no idea either. I have to assume if you're out of the position, you're out of the responsibilities of the position.
Brian662
5 year old buck +
You think Epstein is a partisan issue?
I'm positive that the dems didn't care about digging into anything for four years. I don't think many republicans do either, it opens too many sores in the washington elites on both sides. There's also lots of NDAs from and for lots of people to get any real answers.
Last edited:
Brian662
5 year old buck +
I keep seeing people here say this about the Dems, which may be true...but why would it be true? The Clintons already gave their depositions, who else has been called on it? Any idea who else the Dems would have been trying to protect if this were true?
Trump campaigned on releasing the files, they had a 'made-for-TV' release party with all the inner circle folks. The files sat on Bondi's desk for months. Trump was told by Bondi he was in the files, they moved to stifle the release. Slandered Massie. Called it a Dem Hoax. The Speaker of the House claimed Trump was an informant. The Espstein files Act passed, Trump was forced to sign it, turns out he was named somewhere north of 38,000 times. Bondi redacted the settlement that the Epstein estate paid to Jane Doe #4, who accused Trump and Epstein of sexual assault, whom the FBI found credible.
These are just some of the things we know happened in the past ~8 months. To your point, who knows how much more could be covered up under NDA's, reductions, etc.
I personally don't care whether anyone has a D or R next to their name, if they deserve to be investigated for their dealings with Epstein, they certainly should be. I'd guess a large majority of the American public agrees.
I said dems because if they cared about the Epstein case, they'd have done, something, in the 4 years, they didn't because they don't. It's only a political bitch for them.
For the republicans, several cared during the campaign as a gotcha because they new Trump was clean and hoped to get some dems. After the election they likely found out nothing could come out because of NDAs and the web of corruption designed to keep such things from coming with ruining many people.
That's my take anyway. Nothing of significance was ever going to be allowed to come out.
Howboutthemdawgs
5 year old buck +
Patel and Dan b were all law and order Epstein hawks prior to joining the administration. Listen to their podcast appearances and interviews. I have no clue about bondi but Im sure she was too. So what changed? You think they just realized it was just a witch hunt and all fabricated, or the one person on the planet who could get them to shut up made them shut up?
Brian662
5 year old buck +
Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal in the 2nd US circuit court ended in September of 2024. It is customary for evidence to not be made public while court cases are pending.
Republicans controlled the House 2023-2025, mostly the same bunch who control it now and authored/passed the Epstein Transparency Act (bi-partisan).
"Knew Trump was clean" may be the funniest thing I've ever read in regards to the Epstein stuff.
My take is our nation is so unjustifiably crooked that nobody of any wealth (everyone in the files) will ever be held accountable for trafficking and raping little girls. I am embarrassed how other countries have taken steps to investigate those named and we just act like there is nothing we can do. This is not a R or D problem. It's an American problem.
Brian662
5 year old buck +
Here's your answer on Bondi from an old campaign video. Used to talk the same talk as Kash and Dan B. I remember them getting interviewed and saying unequivocally that Epstein killed himself because "we've seen all the evidence". Funny how that's all changed now.
If there had been anything on Trump the dems would have attacked fullbore.
They made up obviously fake and proven fake for years.
So, again, if there was anything on him, they would have.
Jerry-B-WI
5 year old buck +
If Patel and Bongino were respecful people no one would be able to shut them up about the Epstein files. They were blowing allot of smoke up people's asses until they found out how the system really works.
Brian662
5 year old buck +
The Epstein estate paid a settlement to a girl who accused him of sexual assault when she was 13. The same girl accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was 15. The FBI deemed her credible. The AG who just got fired covered it up when the files were first released.
Accusation, settlement, credible witness, cover-up
Sounds fake
