Dipper -I age more deer than the dnr biologist does for my entire county. There is always exceptions by aging on antler size, but those are young deer. By young I mean 3.5-down, most probably don't see that as young. That one in the garage could be older.
If your happy with the deer you shoot, that's all that matters. Hell I've never been cursed by any deer I shot.
I agree that they are all great bucks and I would be happy to shoot any of them. Maybe I wasn't clear enough that I was only disagreeing with Dipper's assessment that they were younger deer. They're great deer regardless of the age. Nice work.Everyone on an internet forum holds a PhD in aging deer via photos and knows more about your deer than you do. Those are great bucks and I would be happy with all of them. Great job and keep up the hard work.
This year alone I've seen around 30 guys 100% convinced their 100" deer is a 4.5 year old. 90% of the time the deer is gentically inferior, was wounded, possibly sick or otherwise unhealthy. I've heard it all dude. There are plenty of 4 year olds that score 115", I've seen slot of them the last couple years. A couple of youngs bucks could be 4.5.Everyone on an internet forum holds a PhD in aging deer via photos and knows more about your deer than you do. Those are great bucks and I would be happy with all of them. Great job and keep up the hard work.
This year alone I've seen around 30 guys 100% convinced their 100" deer is a 4.5 year old. 90% of the time the deer is gentically inferior, was wounded, possibly sick or otherwise unhealthy. I've heard it all dude. There are plenty of 4 year olds that score 115", I've seen slot of them the last couple years. A couple of youngs bucks could be 4.5.
It sounds like your phd comment was directed to me. That's fine, I don't have to prove anything to you. i have been paid by the wi dnr to age deer, which is part of their Cwd monitoring program. It was $10 a deer, and I cashed the checks.
After years of dealing with thousands of hunters and their trophies I've learned to never comment on age or score. It is perceived as a direct attack at ones manhood. Many are uncomfortable with the truth, so it goes better instead. Since this kid clearly wants to shoot a bigger buck....you gotta let the smaller bucks go. Don't need a phd to figure that out.
Since this kid clearly wants to shoot a bigger buck....you gotta let the smaller bucks go. Don't need a phd to figure that out.
Well said! Just an FYI the OP is already married and has a kid/s and a good job....he's light yrs beyond most other 24 yr olds I know!If you re read the OP, he just mentioned the irony of 9 points. He talks about his FIRST Pope and Young in 2007. He tells his tale of deer harvested many of which were taken in years where he had little time to hunt. He has some deer that appear to be older and others that may be younger. Nothing was said in the OP about wanting shoot older bucks. He is now a young man but he was a KID not long ago. Lighten up. Let him enjoy his success without tearing him down.
I do enjoy your posts and the knowledge you share. I agree with Bill. I also have the smart ass gene.
But.......
I think if you walked into my house, you would tell me how to rearrange my furniture before you sat down. You tell people what is wrong with their mounts, their deer killed and their property. I do enjoy your posts but don't be the guy who runs off the young hunter who gets "it" more than most one week a year warriors. The OP is one of us. I would bet that by the time he is thirty, he will be even pickier about what he shoots. Or, when he is thirty he may have a wife, demanding job, kids and little time to hunt. He may continue to kill the same kind of deer he has killed the last 7 short years and that will be OK too.
Well said! Just an FYI the OP is already married and has a kid/s and a good job....he's light yrs beyond most other 24 yr olds I know!