Will anybody else be at the Cambridge meeting?
You have to give them time to get the info they need from the NSA to screen those applicants to make sure no one that posts on boards like this has a snowballs chance of getting on one of those committees.;):eek:
I'm just messing with ya MoBuck! But if I were the MN DNR trying to further my deer reduction rhetoric, the last bunch of upstarts I'd want on those goal setting teams are guys that post here. You bet your a$$ I'd be screening websites where known "trouble makers" were posting unsavory comments about the DNR before blindly choosing a committee full of guys that have nothing but animosity towards the DNR. Not saying it happened, just that I could.WTF?:eek:
I'm just messing with ya MoBuck! But if I were the MN DNR trying to further my deer reduction rhetoric, the last bunch of upstarts I'd want on those goal setting teams are guys that post here. You bet your a$$ I'd be screening websites where known "trouble makers" were posting unsavory comments about the DNR before blindly choosing a committee full of guys that have nothing but animosity towards the DNR. Not saying it happened, just that I could.
I have sent plenty of emails to some of the top people at the MN DNR so they had my real name and I still got picked for same team that Brooks is on.
Purportedly DNR in Grand Rapids picked the teams without our names on them - only numbers, and then our names were put back on the sheets after the selection process was complete.
http://m.lancasteronline.com/sports...-11e4-bd10-e705a0e0e184.html?mode=jqm[/QUOTE]Interesting read anybody know the article daughtry is quoting?
http://m.lancasteronline.com/sports/outdoors/national-deer-alliance-pledges-to-be-a-a-new-voice/article_89180b5e-9cdb-11e4-bd10-e705a0e0e184.html?mode=jqm
Looks like the teams are stacked with folks from The Nature Conservancy. In reviewing their website they don't appear to be too fond of deer. I never heard of them until now.
Gee...you think that was by design ^^^^? :rolleyes: