The use of conifers (e.g., Blue or Norway Spruce) as road screens or thermal cover bedding areas is a topic often discussed on deer-habitat related sites. For folks not employing apple trees as part of their habitat management efforts, or those incorporating CAR resistant apple cultivars, ERS might be a good choice for a variety of reasons. ERC are extremely drought resistant, will grow much better than spruce/pines in high shade areas, thrive in poor soils, are impacted very little by disease or insects, and are equally-or-more -dense (with much less width) as a screen than other conifers. Their ability to handle drought (especially when newly planted) and grow reasonably well in moderate to dense shade are attributes worthy of consideration. Many folks probably believe their growth rate is inferior to spruce/pine; however, it can be enhanced greatly with 2 simple steps. Reducing competition by employing a 4' X 4' piece of landscape fabric at planting, and fertilizing correctly to ensure good growth and hearty development. Here is the secret ... for fertilizer use limestone rock (aka white rock) as mulch on your landscape fabric and a couple of handfuls of triple-13 for the first 3-4 years. Soils where ERC grow well include .... dry, limestone soils (adaptable). sandy, sandy loam, medium loam clay, clay, rocky, Limestone-based, Caliche type. In m any areas they are readily available at low or no cost. Try them, I don't think you will be disappointed.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0227f/0227f9f3759a170b38d745fa7d7cb7e35a326b9c" alt="ERC cropped.jpg ERC cropped.jpg"
These trees were relocated about 6 years ago (transplants .. probably a couple years old when transplanted)... using fabric and limestone at relocation. During most of the year, they receive very reduced sunlight.
Update ... attached are 3 photos - #1 shows a BS and a ERC that were planted 20' apart on the same day several years ago (at least 6 yrs). They are planted just inside the edge of a woods and receive way less than full sun for most of the growing period each year. #2 photo exhibits the BS ... please note it's size and lack of density (can pretty much see through it) ..., #3 photo reveals the larger size and density of the ERC. Since the growing conditions were pretty much the same - if not identical - for both trees, this very small experiment provides support for the discussion above.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0227f/0227f9f3759a170b38d745fa7d7cb7e35a326b9c" alt="ERC cropped.jpg ERC cropped.jpg"
These trees were relocated about 6 years ago (transplants .. probably a couple years old when transplanted)... using fabric and limestone at relocation. During most of the year, they receive very reduced sunlight.
Update ... attached are 3 photos - #1 shows a BS and a ERC that were planted 20' apart on the same day several years ago (at least 6 yrs). They are planted just inside the edge of a woods and receive way less than full sun for most of the growing period each year. #2 photo exhibits the BS ... please note it's size and lack of density (can pretty much see through it) ..., #3 photo reveals the larger size and density of the ERC. Since the growing conditions were pretty much the same - if not identical - for both trees, this very small experiment provides support for the discussion above.
Attachments
Last edited: