B
BJE80
Guest
Just thinking out loud here. If I was looking for hunting land right now I would not be looking in far northern Wisconsin. The low deer numbers would be enough to scare me away and not knowing what the future holds up there would be a big risk IMO. Instead, I would be looking in the transition zones where the farmland transitions to big woods. I'm guessing the lack of deer numbers are also scaring away other potential land buyers that want good deer hunting.
Does this supply and demand factor drive up the cost of central Wisconsin land since more people are looking to buy in that area? And also decreasing the hunting land values in the north? Typically if something is more desirable it costs more. If something is less desirable it costs less.
Thoughts?
Does this supply and demand factor drive up the cost of central Wisconsin land since more people are looking to buy in that area? And also decreasing the hunting land values in the north? Typically if something is more desirable it costs more. If something is less desirable it costs less.
Thoughts?