Badgers80
A good 3 year old buck
I don’t have any prior knowledge of timber tax, but I looked it up now to try to help. All of what I’m seeing confirms your thinking: that you’d want a discounted cash flow analysis to show that the expected future harvest income compared to your annual expenses and harvest expenses would result in net income. That looks to be the golden ticket in the case of timber whereas it’s actual income or loss for purposes of the hobby loss rules for ag land. I’d be wary of not having an analysis in hand if I were going the timber route.@Badgers80, any thoughts on the timber tax stuff I posted up above?
Timber is nice tax wise in that the growth of the timber stand is taxed at long term capital gains rates when held for at least a year - ag is ordinary rates. Then, there’s an ordinary income piece for additional profit when harvesting but that would be relatively much smaller it seems.
However, the income is when you harvest - likely all in one year for landowners. So, there’s a lot of income in the harvest year vs ag when it’s more spread out. Looks like you used to be able to spread out the income way back when but that’s changed. All of this is to not to say one is distinctly better than the other - if you have forest land, it’s not like you’re going to convert it to ag land for tax purposes or vice versa.