Yes I agree. What we don't know is what is the power draw (amps per hr) of the camera for 6V vs the 9V. If the J camera draws the same amps per hrs at 6V as it does at 9V then essentially the 2 extra batteries are a waste (which is what your examples above show as the run time is the same for both D banks) . Also if the 6V draws anything less than 1.5 times the amps per hr of the 9V it would be more efficient. I would guess that if Cuddeback is changing everything to the 6V that it is probably a better efficiency in power usage?
For those of us that already have the 6D battery packs for the J, if we can run on 4D's and get close to the same life, it would be cheaper. The other huge benefit of it is then we could know when our external packs die. To me this is a huge benefit as I know that when my externals die that I have a few weeks before my camera dies. I am usually down there at least every 3 weeks, so I can change my batteries when I am there so the camera is not out of service. Right now I have no way of getting that far advanced notice as it seems when the cameras go to low they are usually dead in a day or 2. This is of course assuming that Bpressleys test works as intended. LOL. I think he also feels that battery life is better when it completely switches from external to internal instead of using all the batteries at one time.