I used to work in this very field, at a university that while it has lower enrollment than UVU, was physically about 3 times larger. Other than maybe putting up the drone for special events, anyone watching cameras live in real time would be just happenstance. (100+ buildings and probably 1000+ cameras easy)
My buddy once said, a great punishment or interrogation would be to strap a killer/psycho like that to the hockey boards & let the hardest slap shots in the NHL fire 100 mph pucks at him … maybe he’d confess everything after 50 shots ?
The psycho criminal idiots should who we use for testing on all kinds of experimental "projects". Why test on innocent animals when doing the testing on people will give you actual real results. Same with lifers in prison, they lost their rights and should be subjected to anything. The more cruel the better in my opinion.
Zero problem with that. And anytime someone decides to have a “heart” for the savage they should have to watch the video of Charlie’s kids running up to hug him or the poor Ukrainian girl just sitting on a subway getting bled out.
If only we had somewhere we could house criminals who keep committing crimes where they couldn’t hurt law abiding citizens, right?
Impossible. Some law abiding citizen would still have to be subjected to interacting with them. You can limit the extent of exposure but not eliminate it. The only way to guarantee that they will never harm another innocent person is to put them to death.
He wanted to be accessible to the people that he was speaking to.
www.zerohedge.com
I understood what you were saying. My point was that at a minimum the guards are still required to have some level of contact with them, and some of the guards will be harmed by them. Unless you consider the guards to not be innocent citizens?
Truth!
