Understood but from a resource and/or hunting standpoint why is a local more valuable that a nonresident? A lot of locals around me arent worth pissing on if they were on fire. I don’t think the fact you lay your head somewhere makes you a better steward of a resource

Great question. I honestly don’t know because I’m the outside looking in. I guess I would still appreciate the guy who invests in my state in a substantial manor. Not the guy who buys 10 acres so he game the system. But if I’m a resident and a guy comes in from Georgia and spends 2.5 mil to buy 300 next to me, I’m going to run with the assumption he’s on the same page with goals (I could obviously be wrong but it seems unlikely.) Conversely if farmer Johnson lets 5 guys from town come hunt cause his paw grew up with his paw, I have no idea what to expect but my mind would usually go to the worse case.Another thought… if you lived in Iowa like Hillrunner and I, would you want it to change?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sonof….! HahahaSo, Jan 2-4, I’m doing my first out of state hunt to Tennessee to hunt ducks on the Mississippi River. And I’ve put my hat into the draw for an Idaho elk tag next year, so I reserve the right to charge my views in the future. :-)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have the answer to your problems. Move to a location that grows small deer, almost no small game, no pretty mountains, no row crop, very few non residents, hot as hell 8 months out of the year. Did I say Very few NR. Lower land prices. Red country through and through. I am pretty sure the rest makes 150” deer as your monster worth it
How many resident landowners that own property for hunting are not displacing locals from hunting there? Are they just letting locals have free hunting use of the land so they have a place they can go hunting whenever they want? I bet residents are more restricted by other residents than nonresidents.
Not an ordinary circumstance though. And, I don't think you'd wish you had 25 more hunters next to you though. Support for the wildlife resources is different than support for the local and state economy.Not many NR landowners here, but one right across the road from me - 1400 acres. 25 years ago probably 25 different residents hunting it for turkeys, deer, ducks, and hogs. 20 years ago a NR bought it and high fenced it. To my knowledge, a resident never hunted the place since then, and it has resold to another NR since then. But to be honest, a resident could have done the same thing. Big difference to me is residents support the local and state economy 12 months a year
Let me ask you though, does it matter to you in the least if someone supports Arkansas’ economy 12 months out of the year as opposed to the money a nonresident brings? I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a tangible benefit from that. It seems like a pie in the sky theoretical benefit.Not many NR landowners here, but one right across the road from me - 1400 acres. 25 years ago probably 25 different residents hunting it for turkeys, deer, ducks, and hogs. 20 years ago a NR bought it and high fenced it. To my knowledge, a resident never hunted the place since then, and it has resold to another NR since then. But to be honest, a resident could have done the same thing. Big difference to me is residents support the local and state economy 12 months a year
Let me ask you though, does it matter to you in the least if someone supports Arkansas’ economy 12 months out of the year as opposed to the money a nonresident brings? I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a tangible benefit from that. It seems like a pie in the sky theoretical benefit.
Local economies benefit greatly with sales dollars and taxes generated by non-residents.I dont know the dollars and cents of it - but the less contribution to the county economy by a NR - the more a resident landowner will eventually be tasked with paying. Lets say all of a sudden 5% of land in a county was bought by NR owners. Where is the county going to make up that millage and sales tax loss than inflict higher taxes on resident land owners in one way or another?
Another factor is people who buy in others areas CHOOSE to invest there. People who are local in a lot of cases are there cause they have no other choice. I feel like people who invest in an area are generally more apt to be protective of it’s wellbeingI wonder how many non-resident landowners end up retiring on or near their property? My parents didn't move to their property until 10 years ago, but my Dad has owned or hunted that property for 50 years. Locals complain about out of staters buying up their land, but that property was vacant with no activity for 30 years before my parents bought it. At what point are they considered locals?
Sure, their career earned income taxes were collected in another state, but all of their retirement income is spent there. If and when I retire I will do the same that they did. In the meantime, nearly all of my expendable income is spent in Missouri.
Local economies benefit greatly with sales dollars and taxes generated by non-residents.
But ask the sales tax collectors in Destin, Gatlinburg, Eureka Springs, Branson, etc, etc.No way a non resident pays more than me as a 12 month resident to the local economy - no way.
Just an example of non-resident contribution to local economies. If we're talking about just deer hunting, I kept my farm from being subdivided into local residential lots.Deer hunting Meccas there...