Understood but from a resource and/or hunting standpoint why is a local more valuable that a nonresident? A lot of locals around me arent worth pissing on if they were on fire. I don’t think the fact you lay your head somewhere makes you a better steward of a resource

Great question. I honestly don’t know because I’m the outside looking in. I guess I would still appreciate the guy who invests in my state in a substantial manor. Not the guy who buys 10 acres so he game the system. But if I’m a resident and a guy comes in from Georgia and spends 2.5 mil to buy 300 next to me, I’m going to run with the assumption he’s on the same page with goals (I could obviously be wrong but it seems unlikely.) Conversely if farmer Johnson lets 5 guys from town come hunt cause his paw grew up with his paw, I have no idea what to expect but my mind would usually go to the worse case.Another thought… if you lived in Iowa like Hillrunner and I, would you want it to change?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sonof….! HahahaSo, Jan 2-4, I’m doing my first out of state hunt to Tennessee to hunt ducks on the Mississippi River. And I’ve put my hat into the draw for an Idaho elk tag next year, so I reserve the right to charge my views in the future. :-)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have the answer to your problems. Move to a location that grows small deer, almost no small game, no pretty mountains, no row crop, very few non residents, hot as hell 8 months out of the year. Did I say Very few NR. Lower land prices. Red country through and through. I am pretty sure the rest makes 150” deer as your monster worth it
How many resident landowners that own property for hunting are not displacing locals from hunting there? Are they just letting locals have free hunting use of the land so they have a place they can go hunting whenever they want? I bet residents are more restricted by other residents than nonresidents.
Not an ordinary circumstance though. And, I don't think you'd wish you had 25 more hunters next to you though. Support for the wildlife resources is different than support for the local and state economy.Not many NR landowners here, but one right across the road from me - 1400 acres. 25 years ago probably 25 different residents hunting it for turkeys, deer, ducks, and hogs. 20 years ago a NR bought it and high fenced it. To my knowledge, a resident never hunted the place since then, and it has resold to another NR since then. But to be honest, a resident could have done the same thing. Big difference to me is residents support the local and state economy 12 months a year
Let me ask you though, does it matter to you in the least if someone supports Arkansas’ economy 12 months out of the year as opposed to the money a nonresident brings? I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a tangible benefit from that. It seems like a pie in the sky theoretical benefit.Not many NR landowners here, but one right across the road from me - 1400 acres. 25 years ago probably 25 different residents hunting it for turkeys, deer, ducks, and hogs. 20 years ago a NR bought it and high fenced it. To my knowledge, a resident never hunted the place since then, and it has resold to another NR since then. But to be honest, a resident could have done the same thing. Big difference to me is residents support the local and state economy 12 months a year
Let me ask you though, does it matter to you in the least if someone supports Arkansas’ economy 12 months out of the year as opposed to the money a nonresident brings? I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a tangible benefit from that. It seems like a pie in the sky theoretical benefit.