I remain very suspicious of any state intervention and special attention to specific parcels. SE MN gets attention because of pockets of ag complaints. WI, MI, MO have hired personal to deal with similar issues in their states. No state seems to be addressing the low density areas.
Easiest message seems macro management is failing the majority of the MN hunters. If that inlcudes you, here are the tools to get you out of that cold pocket. MN DNR will respond with a micro tools (personel/programs) if hot pockets grow.
Its difficult for me to try and ignore the DNR's public fleecing because it is not going to stop. They will react. The current crew will not change their mindset, but they will react to any plans to grow the herd. They wont like it.
I think if it is an interesting ad where people can learn something maybe less criticism will exist. Just a thought and trying to add something to the discussion.
I have had difficulty bringing some above topics 'home' to many of our coop members. We did sell 175 apples trees one year.
deer habitat sample plan and hinge cutting techniques or habitat projects - (very few of those in coop have had at it. they are afraid. they dont have a plan. they need a plan and some in field tutoring. you need to get in there and help them property specific. you need to get them started.)
The best way to bring it to their 40 is bring it to their 40. I can pull up aerials for 15 guys and beat out an access/exit plan and suggest improvements for lines of movement for each property in 45 minutes, and then head to the field showing browse impacts for the area. Then we hinge some bedding/bockades/edge feather on a volunteers place and the boots are off and running in the area. YOUR AREA.
Problem is some dont want to share secrets with their neighbors. And no cooperation ever comes about. And no real improvement. Trust factor is a ball buster and a deal breaker for many.