Three more than I’ve gotten this week!Huge increase in turkey numbers on my farm.Not what some people have shown, but I'll take it.
View attachment 75319
How near is his season?
At 25 yards, I wouldnt be worried about 2 3/4” lead 6’sTrying to figure out a 2nd 20 gauge turkey gun to use, so two sons can hunt at the same time. Would you guys be ok using 2.75" federal tss 9 pushing only 1 1/8 oz load from an old single shot model 37 Winchester? Barrel is stamped - choke which most likely means a full choke I think. In keeping with the spirit of the thread, shots would be kept to a max of 25 yards.
The success of our turkey population is somewhat of a perplexing situation to me. I am pretty much willing to do anything - down to close season for a year of two if need be - to grow the population. But, turkeys are not like deer. I can grow deer on my place. The turkeys dont respond positively to any of my habitat improvements - maybe slightly to predator removal during the nesting season. There havent been any research that I have seen that any realistic habitat manipulation on a small scale - 350 acres like I have - will likely result in improved turkey numbers.In todays turkey sign of the apocalypse…
A friend sent me a video of his four year old killing his first turkey. That’s right 4. Sitting in a giant mega blind with 4 people, .410 with tss in a lead sled deal. A four year old has no business shooting anything.
So just in one snapshot here’s all the things the turkey faced in one video that it wouldn’t in say 2010
Legal .410
Tss
Youth season (show me one study where youth season has improved hunter retention)
Mega blinds
Light weight lead sled deals
Cell cam showing birds using the plot
There was a strutter decoy of course (still illegal in a couple states thankfully)
4 year old being able to kill a bird
For anyone who’s optimistic about the future of the species I’m amazed given its battles that just we can control let alone the mountains it faces without our doing.
I don’t have an opinion on the season date issue. Part of me thinks it’s good because it allows hens to get bred. Other part of me has seen some research from Harper that said it didn’t matter on their test grounds. But here’s a chart showing population increase in Louisiana starting year 2 after delaying the season. May be coincidence but can’t rule out the timing.![]()
many weeks ago, the hens were bunched and the gobblers started breading them
![]()
The hens, after breeding, head out to lay - and the hen groups start to break up
![]()
Wouldnt doubt some hens are starting to set, now - and the gobs have to go on walkabout to find some action
![]()
later in the spring - receptive hens get hard to find so the gobs have to take what they can get - even strutting for the crows
![]()
oftentimes, a hen will have a nest destroyed and no other hens around so they may seek out other birds for companionship. The gobblers are wore out by now - this is how turkey buzzards came to be
![]()
with our season opening so late in the year, the gobblers will be done and the trannies will take over
Dont hesitate to ask for more information on the breeding hierarchy of the wild turkey. To he11 with Dr Chamberlain![]()
Arkansas is the poster child for moving to a late season. We started in 2010 and our own g&f admitted that the spike in 2012 was due to favorable weather. The years following, poult production was dismal - the worst of all times that the survey has been done. I think the last couple years are similar to many states across the south - poult production is up regardless of any management practices in place. I think Harper’s findings are pretty solid - comparing counties with late season opening and those with earlier opening at the same time. If the late season timing did improve poult production, it should be something that is evident the first year. Personally, if I have to pick between Harper and Chamberlain - it is going to be Harper everytime - I dont care if Chamberlain is UGAI don’t have an opinion on the season date issue. Part of me thinks it’s good because it allows hens to get bred. Other part of me has seen some research from Harper that said it didn’t matter on their test grounds. But here’s a chart showing population increase in Louisiana starting year 2 after delaying the season. May be coincidence but can’t rule out the timing.
View attachment 75877
For sure on Harper. but there’s so many variables it’s hard to isolate just one and draw a definitive conclusion. I applaud states for at least trying something even if it were unpopular.Arkansas is the poster child for moving to a late season. We started in 2010 and our own g&f admitted that the spike in 2012 was due to favorable weather. The years following, poult production was dismal - the worst of all times that the survey has been done. I think the last couple years are similar to many states across the south - poult production is up regardless of any management practices in place. I think Harper’s findings are pretty solid - comparing counties with late season opening and those with earlier opening at the same time. If the late season timing did improve poult production, it should be something that is evident the first year. Personally, if I have to pick between Harper and Chamberlain - it is going to be Harper everytime - I dont care if Chamberlain is UGA
View attachment 75878
That is the point where we were in AR. Most hunters were willing to give almost anything a shot. The late season opener is something that is really easy to tell if it works. Like in TN - you could have two or three counties with late season openers and easily compare poult production between those counties and the rest of the state. Poult production is something that should show fairly quickly with a change in regulation or habitat manipulaionFor sure on Harper. but there’s so many variables it’s hard to isolate just one and draw a definitive conclusion. I applaud states for at least trying something even if it were unpopular.