• If you are posting pictures, and they aren't posting in the correct orientation, please flush your browser cache and try again.

    Edge
    Safari/iOS
    Chrome

Trapping deer with a helicopter

Baker

5 year old buck +
Something many of you may never have seen, Video showing deer trapping in the brush country along the Rio Grand River

 
What is the reason they’re doing this?

Seems like a lot of trouble and expense for a doe quota. ;)
 
Last edited:
That's almost as bad as using trail cameras. ;)
 
Interesting. Why nets instead of tranq darts?

You're not kidding about the thorns and spikes. Nopal is bad enough, but the cholla almost seem like they seek you out.

That crew seems like real pros. I hope the cartels don't find out about that pilot and give him the old plato-o-plomo ultimatum.
 
What is the reason they’re doing this?

Seems like a lot of trouble and expense for a doe quota. ;)
Lol, Imagine a world where...

We actually sell the does. With a reputation for having the highest quality native genetics in Mexico we have buyers every year wanting to buy our does to improve genetics on their ranch. These does will be bred to pen raised bucks the owner has then released to his ranch for pasture born fawns. Buyer pays for helicopter trapping and I make a nice profit. Good for the does. Good for the buyer. Good for me.

In just a few hours I have removed 50 does from the ranch . Don't have to have a bunch of Rednecks running around shooting up the place all season stressing the herd and ruining the ambience of the camp. Perfect!
 
That's almost as bad as using trail cameras. ;
I was laughing putting this video together thinking about all the rhetoric recently about technology ruining hunting. Kept imagining a drone trying to ' herd' deer around manipulating their travel.
 
Interesting. Why nets instead of tranq darts?

You're not kidding about the thorns and spikes. Nopal is bad enough, but the cholla almost seem like they seek you out.

That crew seems like real pros. I hope the cartels don't find out about that pilot and give him the old plato-o-plomo ultimatum.
We have used ground blinds with tranq darts before. Very slow and harder to trap enough timely for transport . Shooting a dart from a helicopter would be nearly impossible. The helicopter with a net is fast , efficient with zero mortality ever thru the years .
 
Shooting a dart from a helicopter would be nearly impossible. The helicopter with a net is fast , efficient with zero mortality ever thru the years .

Interesting. I would have thought a dart gun would be effective, but I've never tried to shoot from a helicopter. That crew is top-notch.
 
Lol, Imagine a world where...

We actually sell the does. With a reputation for having the highest quality native genetics in Mexico we have buyers every year wanting to buy our does to improve genetics on their ranch. These does will be bred to pen raised bucks the owner has then released to his ranch for pasture born fawns. Buyer pays for helicopter trapping and I make a nice profit. Good for the does. Good for the buyer. Good for me.

In just a few hours I have removed 50 does from the ranch . Don't have to have a bunch of Rednecks running around shooting up the place all season stressing the herd and ruining the ambience of the camp. Perfect!
Lol. How does one objectively assess a single doe’s genes?
 
Lol. How does one objectively assess a single doe’s genes?

He stated that his ranch is known for some of the best genetics in Mexico, not that he was guaranteeing that every doe contained the best genetics.

The person buying, breeding, and releasing the doe realistically gets at least 2 deer (possibly 3 if she births twins) with a high chance of good genetics, and 50% of the fawn’s progeny is known outright by using a breeder buck.

It seems like a win/win for the herd and his pocketbook to handle doe depredation this way rather than sharpshooting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I’m happy for baker. My snark is directed toward his buyers. My question was more of “By what metric are his genetics different?” I thought the ability to influence genetics in a free range herd (and a sufficiently large enclosed one, for that matter) had been debunked long ago.
 
I’m happy for baker. My snark is directed toward his buyers. My question was more of “By what metric are his genetics different?” I thought the ability to influence genetics in a free range herd (and a sufficiently large enclosed one, for that matter) had been debunked long ago.

Epigenetics are pretty wild. Mammal mothers that have had access to higher nutrition for the entirety of their lives pass on genes that “turn on” for their offspring that they themselves didn’t have. When this happens over multiple generations, the difference in genetic expression can be pretty drastic. It has been shown that the nutritional plane a doe had during pregnancy will affect her male offspring’s antler potential for the entirety of his life, even after his nutritional plane has improved later in life. I can only assume that the same epigenetic improvement happens for doe fawns as well.

Moving deer from an area that has proven to have higher quality genetic expression to areas that do not could be a decent way to jumpstart these epigenetic changes in the local herd... by simply transplanting deer that already have these epigenetic selections activated.

If the available nutrition doesn’t rise to maintain these epigenetic selections, though, it is surely a short lived benefit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It has been shown that the nutritional plane a doe had during pregnancy will affect her male offspring’s antler potential for the entirety of his life, even after his nutritional plane has improved later in life

Interesting. That makes a really strong case for food plots. I think I will devote more time to that this year. And fruit trees, because I'm addicted.

I got my mineral sites out a couple years ago, so I hope that's helping. I'm working with two very different populations, but both need cold season food. I guess both populations would probably benefit from high-protein food sources in the summer, too.
 
Epigenetics are pretty wild. Mammal mothers that have had access to higher nutrition for the entirety of their lives pass on genes that “turn on” for their offspring that they themselves didn’t have. When this happens over multiple generations, the difference in genetic expression can be pretty drastic. It has been shown that the nutritional plane a doe had during pregnancy will affect her male offspring’s antler potential for the entirety of his life, even after his nutritional plane has improved later in life. I can only assume that the same epigenetic improvement happens for doe fawns as well.

Moving deer from an area that has proven to have higher quality genetic expression to areas that do not could be a decent way to jumpstart these epigenetic changes in the local herd... by simply transplanting deer that already have these epigenetic selections activated.

If the available nutrition doesn’t rise to maintain these epigenetic selections, though, it is surely a short lived benefit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Respectfully, that was all kinda my point and I’m well aware of all that. You just described why they’re valuable for their exceptional health and fitness and on a generational basis — credit to baker. To me that’s different than their being from some pocket of genetic standouts. Semantics I guess, but elevated epigenetic quality is another way of saying “healthy and fit.”
 
I'm kind of curious about the logistics of moving the 50 or so live wild animals. I am assuming this is for another ranch in Mexico because I would think the permitting would be brutal to bring them back into the states.

Thanks Baker! This was certainly interesting. The whole video I kept thinking to myself why would someone go to these lengths and you buried the lede with the great explanation at the end. I was also really surprised how open things look from the air vs on the ground.
 
Back
Top