4.3 GDP?Most of the tariffs are bad for the US. You can see that in the new inflation numbers. Otherwise yeah, starting off the year pretty strong.
View attachment 87356
Curious to see reactions on this one.
Most of the tariffs are bad for the US. You can see that in the new inflation numbers. Otherwise yeah, starting off the year pretty strong.
4.3 GDP?
Tariffs are a long game. USA was getting ripped off for decades.
IMO tariffs are simiply a tax. But as taxes go, I think tariffs are preferable over most of the other taxes.
On income taxes there is talk about a flat fax, but there isn't enough support to get it done. So we're left with highly progressive income taxes. Tariffs are regressive (low income spend a higher percent of their income on tariff inflation than high income people do). So if you take a progressive income tax and layer a regressive tariff tax, you end up with a tax system much flatter than would attainable in the income tax system alone.
Personally, I support tariffs for the sole reason that they are regressive. The only other politically acceptable methods of taxing the poor are taxes on alcohol, tobacco, gambling, etc (which I also support).
As for tariffs causing inflation, that is true of all taxes. Taxes remove the buying power of the people. Which side of the ledger (income vs sales) that happens on does not change the fact that is taking away buying power.
ok, I'll shut up now. Back your regularly scheduled meme thread.
That sounds like Trump's understanding of tariffs.
Let me ask you this: if the US produces less than 1% of the coffee and chocolate that it consumes, what is the point of a tariff on coffee and chocolate imports? It will never shift production to the US. All it does is make those products more expensive for American consumers.
I also disagree with you fundamentally on regressive taxes. Taxing the poor is not beneficial to society. This has been proven time and time again.
FWIW I'm not fond of how Trump is going about, I'm only stating I support the general strategy of tariffs.
Regarding coffee & chocolate, tariffs still have the benefits of raising revenue. Tariffs are a sales tax on things not produced domestically.
It depends on how we define "poor". At tax time we're all too poor, right?
Tax discourages whatever activity it is applied to. Given the US's consumption lifestyle / high spending / low savings / etc, I think discouraging spending $ is better for society than discouraging working.
Let me ask you this: if the US produces less than 1% of the coffee and chocolate that it consumes, what is the point of a tariff on coffee and chocolate imports?
Gross Domestic ProductNot sure what 4.3GDP means, but happy to have a discussion about tariffs.