One thing I have been noticing about some of the more shaded panels is that the battery never reaches peak voltage, and it does not matter. The only draw back is reduced capacity and perhaps a day or three less runtime with no sun.I am running just about all cameras on solar. Several of my Cuddeback 3600’s have been deployed two years and are working great. These seem to work well in fairly shaded areas. The SpyPoint cameras with built in solar are nice, but almost all of them experienced full discharge during long periods of cloudy/overcast winter days. While the SpyPoints revive when the sun comes out, the Cuddeback continue to run even after several days of bad weather.
I sheepishly need to admit this as well. I have had two drop off the report and the camera sit out for 8-10 months or so because I forgot about them. In both cases, a rodent chewed through the older solar cable. I said to hell with that now and only put out metal wired cables.My first cuddeback 3600 just hit 691 days on a J model. I have a mix of twenty 3600/sun and shade, just ordered six more. Find myself forgetting where are my cameras are since I only visit them once a year or so
I'm considering the cuddeback solar panels. Most of my cameras are NOT in full sun. Is the sun and shade PW003 worth the extra cost over the 3600? Are they the same size? Can't find much for specs on the websiteMy first cuddeback 3600 just hit 691 days on a J model. I have a mix of twenty 3600/sun and shade, just ordered six more. Find myself forgetting where are my cameras are since I only visit them once a year or so
Jackpine, I use the 3600's on all of my Cuddeback's and they work fine. Three are in serious shade, the other four are in partial shade. I have never had one run out of juice. The PW003 is definitely larger.I'm considering the cuddeback solar panels. Most of my cameras are NOT in full sun. Is the sun and shade PW003 worth the extra cost over the 3600? Are they the same size? Can't find much for specs on the website
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
PW3 is about double the size of the 3600. The three 3600s I have only work well in full sun, and they perform best when tilted upward about 30 degrees. The PW3s are mounted vertically, on the south side of the tree, and have worked everywhere I've put them in the woods. In my mind absolutely worth the extra cost.I'm considering the cuddeback solar panels. Most of my cameras are NOT in full sun. Is the sun and shade PW003 worth the extra cost over the 3600? Are they the same size? Can't find much for specs on the website
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Not quite double in size, but close. Easier to install.Thanks guys! It sounds like the sun and shade is worth the extra cost then. My only concern is the larger size because I will probably relocate some cams on a seasonal basis. I see the 3600 is about 6"x7", so is the 003 like 12"x14" then?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Thank you!Differences.... The PW003 is the more expensive panel.
View attachment 68461