Mystery Drones - Who is flying them?

If there's a nuke in the area, the government put it there.

The ammunition ship I was stationed on was home ported in Earle, NJ. Yes we were nuclear capable.
Wouldn't be much of a stretch to think Brandon's government put it there, you are correct.
 
If there's a nuke in the area...
The problem isn't building one (dirty bomb), the problem is delivering it. But if it comes into the Port of Newark in a conex container.....
 
I guess you can call me a conspiracy theorist but it would not surprise me if there’s a big distraction, explosion, 💥 something on the day of Trumps inauguration!
 
Wouldn't be much of a stretch to think Brandon's government put it there, you are correct.
Why would you put blame on Biden? I didn't serve last week, Reagan was pres. when I served.

The Navy doesn't have ammunition ships anymore, but I can guarantee you that ships are still loaded with ammunition at NWS Earle.
 
The problem isn't building one (dirty bomb), the problem is delivering it. But if it comes into the Port of Newark in a conex container.....
Here's a theory. Maybe the military is running A&I drills in the area. It would be nobody's business other than the military if they were doing that. We did it for years and never notified any civilians if or when we were doing it. We didn't use drones but technology has changed and maybe that's how they do it now.
 
This is an interesting article. For one thing they make the following statement: "Drones cannot be flown over people or vehicles, and operators must follow airspace restrictions." If that was the case nearly any drone in a populated area would be illegal.
 
This is an interesting article. For one thing they make the following statement: "Drones cannot be flown over people or vehicles, and operators must follow airspace restrictions." If that was the case nearly any drone in a populated area would be illegal.
I’d need to see some clarification on that because you’re right, it would be almost impossible to fly 90% of the country.
 
I’d need to see some clarification on that because you’re right, it would be almost impossible to fly 90% of the country.
Not sure what laws are on drones and operators. I read that drones are limited to 400 feet elevation. Not sure if you need a license?......or need to register the drone? Going forward, it seems like some government agency will want to regulate and charge lots of fees to own and operate drones.
 
 
Drones are limited to 400' AGL. Drones are also prohibited from flying over people and vehicles under some circumstances, mainly hovering. If during flight you pass over people or vehicles, you are exempt. You can also get an FAA waiver to break most all FAA rules if you apply and have cause. You do not need a license if you are a "hobbyist." If you are flying commercially, you need an FAA part 107 certificate. If anything you do is commercial, Law Enforcement, realty, cinematography, crop spraying, etc, you must have the FAA part 107.
 
Funny, the most advanced security state on earth has been bested again by, this time by simple drones. We can find every single person that went inside the capitol, but we cannot find the 500,000 children homeland security sourced for the human trafficking market inside the US. Maybe check those tunnels of which no one ever seems to question.

We have to really question where the 2.5 trillion we dump into war spending goes every year. God help us if we ever have to go up against a military built to win, with ours built to launder money to the pedophile club.
 
Well that’s certainly a theory…i subscribe to the one we (someone in the government at some level) knows exactly what is going on and it may be for the good of security they don’t say
Bingo
 
Well that’s certainly a theory…i subscribe to the one we (someone in the government at some level) knows exactly what is going on and it may be for the good of security they don’t say

That could be true. If it is true, then our President has blatantly lied to us once again. His spokesperson, John Kirby said plainly to the press that our government didn't know who was behind the drones. But, why should we be surprised at Biden lying.................

If it is them, they could tell us it is them without telling us specifically what they are doing. I think most reasonable people understand that the government has to do some things that can't be made public.

PS - Just saw Mayorkas as I was typing this saying essentially the same thing. I sure hope it is a lie rather than incompetence.
 
The two top theories...

They're trying to scare the public / congress into passing H.R.8610 (Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act of 2024).

We should all hope and pray that's the reason.

Because top theory number 2 is they're looking for a nuclear weapon rumored to be coming from Eastern Europe.
 
That could be true. If it is true, then our President has blatantly lied to us once again. His spokesperson, John Kirby said plainly to the press that our government didn't know who was behind the drones. But, why should we be surprised at Biden lying.................

If it is them, they could tell us it is them without telling us specifically what they are doing. I think most reasonable people understand that the government has to do some things that can't be made public.

PS - Just saw Mayorkas as I was typing this saying essentially the same thing. I sure hope it is a lie rather than incompetence.

One thing we know for sure, they are incompetent liars!
 
A quote from the Fish and wildlife service:

"Because of the uncertainty around the safety of drones, the Department of the Interior currently only uses drones for emergency situations. Additionally, due to concerns around harassment of wildlife, drone use is prohibited on national wildlife refuges."

The above statement is from the following web site:



I hope everyone can see the hypocrisy of this. They are too unsafe and may harass wildlife over a national wildlife refuge, but it's perfectly fine to do it to your neighbor. This reminds me of the gun control Nazis in Washington. You shouldn't be able to own a gun for your protection, but it's perfectly fine for their bodyguards to own guns to protect them.
 
A quote from the Fish and wildlife service:

"Because of the uncertainty around the safety of drones, the Department of the Interior currently only uses drones for emergency situations. Additionally, due to concerns around harassment of wildlife, drone use is prohibited on national wildlife refuges."

The above statement is from the following web site:



I hope everyone can see the hypocrisy of this. They are too unsafe and may harass wildlife over a national wildlife refuge, but it's perfectly fine to do it to your neighbor. This reminds me of the gun control Nazis in Washington. You shouldn't be able to own a gun for your protection, but it's perfectly fine for their bodyguards to own guns to protect them.
Winner winner chicken dinner!
 
A fellow I know is into drones big time. One time he attempted to fly his drone, and it would not respond. A message came up on the laptop screen that flying at that time was punishable by the FBI for unauthoriized use. Turns out Air Force One with Brandon on board had just lifted off from the airport 40 miles away. So the gov't can indeed control their use.
 
Back
Top