Cuddelink 101?

I know that they say a capacitor addition fixes this, but I also have a home cell camera that this will be the third time it will be sent back for the same problem. Are they sure that is the fix. Thus I ask will the new firmware address this problem or is there more that needs to be done to fix the problem.
 
I know that they say a capacitor addition fixes this, but I also have a home cell camera that this will be the third time it will be sent back for the same problem. Are they sure that is the fix. Thus I ask will the new firmware address this problem or is there more that needs to be done to fix the problem.
this is not something that firmware can address, if it was me and i had that issue more than once id trade it in for a L home , the L has advantages over the G and you won't have the capacitor issue again.
 
this is not something that firmware can address, if it was me and i had that issue more than once id trade it in for a L home , the L has advantages over the G and you won't have the capacitor issue again.
What are the advantages of an L home vs a G?
 
What are the advantages of an L home vs a G?
dual sim cards , can remotely change from att to verizon or vice versa, improved case/housing design, will soon allow for remote firmware updates, slightly better battery life
 
dual sim cards , can remotely change from att to verizon or vice versa, improved case/housing design, will soon allow for remote firmware updates, slightly better battery life
Will there ever be an L home with camera?
 
Will there ever be an L home with camera?
in the future its likely, but definitely not this year. The reality is, unless you are running a very small network (under 3-5 cameras ) a non camera home is better for overall performance , especially with Remote firmware updates coming and hi res images possible with Gen 3 cuddelink. There are other reasons as well(cost placing it up high for service and preventing theft etc). I switched all of my networks to L home , even those that run under 10 cameras.
 
in the future its likely, but definitely not this year. The reality is, unless you are running a very small network (under 3-5 cameras ) a non camera home is better for overall performance , especially with Remote firmware updates coming and hi res images possible with Gen 3 cuddelink. There are other reasons as well(cost placing it up high for service and preventing theft etc). I switched all of my networks to L home , even those that run under 10 cameras.
I'm on a G home camera(with solar panel) with 11 L remotes(+solar). The remote firmware update does seem handy, but in reality, I'm not sure if it's worth $130 plus the possible cost of the solar panel. The G home is in the only place I get cell service and I want a camera there too.

Can you detail what "better performance" means? I'm on the mid tier plan, and not sure I need to step up to unlimited, but am very interested in being able to pull full resolution pictures for pics that warrant it
 
It really depends on deer population in your area. I had 15 cameras on one network last year during hunting season. I set the rate to one image and never had a backup. That was with a G home.
 
I'm on a G home camera(with solar panel) with 11 L remotes(+solar). The remote firmware update does seem handy, but in reality, I'm not sure if it's worth $130 plus the possible cost of the solar panel. The G home is in the only place I get cell service and I want a camera there too.

Can you detail what "better performance" means? I'm on the mid tier plan, and not sure I need to step up to unlimited, but am very interested in being able to pull full resolution pictures for pics that warrant it
L is completely different than the G, different electronics , components etc. It's 2 generations beyond the G series. It has Dual sim, different housing , not as affected by internal heat, better battery life when running just 4d's (although i always recommend external power) If you want to use Gen 3 i would recommend an L home especially if hi res images are a feature you will want to use.
A network is much more efficient when the home only has to send and receive , adding the picture taking function ads another dimension and can slow down your network . Keep in mind the home can only do one function at a time. When cuddelink added cellular to the mix, the original homes were home only , no camera..... as it allowed it to be more efficient. You can also mount the camera high for better cell service if needed and also out of sight or up high for theft deterrence. I switched to all L series homes this year. You can just about buy an L home and another remote for the cost of the G cell home as well.
 
It really depends on deer population in your area. I had 15 cameras on one network last year during hunting season. I set the rate to one image and never had a backup. That was with a G home.
Its sounds like somehow it worked for you but I would NEVER recommend using batch 1 image when running cuddelink. If it hasnt already, it will eventually cause you an issue. Doesnt matter how many images or deer you have on your property. A stand alone unit like tracks is OK to use this way but not cuddelink. I have seen it enough times that it's the first thing i ask, it can completely lock up a network and cause your home to go offline causing you to visit it to start it again. Im actually surprised you made it a season. I recommend 1 hour or at the least 5 images for batch.
 
Back
Top