We are trying to establish a couple perennial plots totaling about 1 acre. we have 4 other plots totaling about another 1 acre and that is what where we were just going to plant the WR/WW/Oates for late fall, early winter and have the WR/WW for next spring. Are you suggesting just using WR/ Medium Red Clover for everything?
I am north of you, and my oats make it into October. The deer pretty much eat it to the ground though, but if you cage off an area, it will get about 6-8 inches. But it get the deer interested into coming into the plot, while the wr, and ww don’t have the attractant that the oats have. For the $4 for a bushel of oats, I say it is money well spent.
If your goal is to have clover in the plot, then by all means get clover in now, then plant wr in a few weeks.
I agree with Rye being great, although it doesn't fix nitrogen. I plant at least 100# / ac rye, throw in 40#/ac oats, 5# / ac radish, and the clover of your choice. I use a lot of medium red, but if you want a perennial white clover plot, plant it with the grain cover crop. I usually add in any leftover soybeans I have laying around. They don't last as long as the oats even, but they love them till they freeze out. You can't put down too much cereal grain...
I think what Tree Spud meant was rye's ability to scavenge N via it's deep root system bringing it to the surface and storing it within the tissues of the plant to be released and used after the dead plant material breaks down, thus his use of the word "affixing". Surely, this may or may not be construed as being similar to what we view legumes as doing, because they too are considered to "affix" N due to the fact they collect free N from the atmosphere and "affix" it to the root nodules via a symbiotic relationship with the rhizobium bacteria, albeit the legume/rhizobium relationship is a FAR better vector for "creating" added N in the soil vs the "scavenging" effect of cereal rye. "Affixing" may have been a curious use of the word where and how it was used, but it depends on how you view it I guess, because in the end, rye does something very similar to legumes in the fact that it takes free N (via it leaching deep out of the normal root zone of most plants) and pulls it to the surface for later use, much like legumes taking free N from the air and storing it in the roots near the surface for future use.
I think what Tree Spud meant was rye's ability to scavenge N via it's deep root system bringing it to the surface and storing it within the tissues of the plant to be released and used after the dead plant material breaks down, thus his use of the word "affixing". Surely, this may or may not be construed as being similar to what we view legumes as doing, because they too are considered to "affix" N due to the fact they collect free N from the atmosphere and "affix" it to the root nodules via a symbiotic relationship with the rhizobium bacteria, albeit the legume/rhizobium relationship is a FAR better vector for "creating" added N in the soil vs the "scavenging" effect of cereal rye. "Affixing" may have been a curious use of the word where and how it was used, but it depends on how you view it I guess, because in the end, rye does something very similar to legumes in the fact that it takes free N (via it leaching deep out of the normal root zone of most plants) and pulls it to the surface for later use, much like legumes taking free N from the air and storing it in the roots near the surface for future use.