Jordan Selsor
5 year old buck +
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-fired-Armour-sponsors-horrifying-video.html
I think this co is making a mistake. What you guys think?
I think this co is making a mistake. What you guys think?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-fired-Armour-sponsors-horrifying-video.html
I think this co is making a mistake. What you guys think?
You are probably right to some extent though Jack, most people in this day and age are gutless turds, and even though they say they will no longer use their products, 6 months from now they will be sporting the latest and greatest UA "hunting fashions". Especially since I do not see the likes of Tiffypop and the Drury's snubbing their noses up at their corporate sponsor, so the mindset will be that if Tiffy still wears it I should too. UA should take a giant hit on this, but whether they do will remain to be seen and will be directly on the backs of the resolve of the hunters.
Sure there is Jack. One can choose to buy from companies that have an honest, vested interest in the sport of hunting and cut out purchases to those companies that simply pander to the hunters to improve their bottom lines(which we have found out is what Under Armor has apparently been doing). If the sales drop enough, they will go away and leave us with the cream of the crop businesses that actually support hunting without "limitations and stipulations".There is not much we can do to influence the behavior of companies that see us a solely a line of business,
Sure there is Jack. One can choose to buy from companies that have an honest, vested interest in the sport of hunting and cut out purchases to those companies that simply pander to the hunters to improve their bottom lines(which we have found out is what Under Armor has apparently been doing). If the sales drop enough, they will go away and leave us with the cream of the crop businesses that actually support hunting without "limitations and stipulations".
Sure there is Jack. One can choose to buy from companies that have an honest, vested interest in the sport of hunting and cut out purchases to those companies that simply pander to the hunters to improve their bottom lines(which we have found out is what Under Armor has apparently been doing). If the sales drop enough, they will go away and leave us with the cream of the crop businesses that actually support hunting without "limitations and stipulations".
Yup, in the Port Covington neighborhood, and the billionaire owner of UA wants the City of Baltimore to pony up a billion plus in tax breaks and incentives so that he doesn't have to pay any property taxes back to the already underfunded city for the next 25 or so years. Like all the corrupt politicos out there, they are pushing it along through the "underreported and secretive fast track" method of pocket lining.Isn't UA building or trying to build a huge new facility for hunting clothes in Baltimore right now?
Not every company has to pander to shareholders interests, some are not publicly traded, correct? I like helping the "small guys".