Someday isle
5 year old buck +
I live in Missouri where we don't have any restrictions on rifles being used as long as it's a .22 centerfire or larger. While I personally consider a .22 caliber centerfire to be too small for my comfort zone I have no problem with someone else's choice if they believe in it. The truth is we can't control what other people think or say or do. We can only control how we respond to it. I don't think we should legislate what others choose to hunt with so long as it is legal. I prefer a bolt action rifle. While I own a number of rifles from a .223 to .458 win mag I most often grab a 7mm magnum. I've often heard "What do you need such a cannon for? They're just deer!" But it's what I choose and I practice with it a lot. I can't work a bolt as fast a semi auto but I'm close to lever action speed. I've only fired two shots at an animal on three occasions and all of those weren't needed. The first one would have been fatal. I just didn't know that when I fired the second shot. An unprepared hunter with a lever action or pump is likely just as dangerous as an unprepared hunter with a semi-auto. Unfortunately there will always be spray and pray hunters - but I think they are just as dangerous no matter what weapon they choose. I'm in favor of more opportunities for legitimate hunters, not less. Taking the safety question out of the equation it's not unlike the crossbow vs vertical bow question we've had in Missouri. I prefer my compound but I say let them hunt if it grows our sport and its opportunities. If I lived in Pennsylvania I'd welcome the new opportunity. If there have been hunter accidents in my state caused by the use of a semi auto I've never heard them publicized. You'd think the anti hunting and anti gun crowds would be all over that. Just my two cents.