OK, guys, I hear your concerns. But, I would also offer that organizations inevitably begin to accumulate critics as they evolve and grow and age. That is as true with the QDMA group as it is with Google, Apple, Mercedes Motors, your in-home business, or your local church. It is an inevitability. I get that.
But, the goodness or badness of QDMA, or any organization for that matter, is not the thrust of my earlier post. My view is simply: The more the merrier. I win by more. This Habitat-Talk site is a good thing. Other sites..... more ‘other’ sites...... is also a good thing.
Again, I go back to my belief that it is “knowledge” that is the real coin-of-the-realm here. Not loyalties. Not fors or againsts. We, as the consumers, want as much useful information as we can get. So more sites, like this good one here, and like the several others offering habitat‘knowledge’ ….well, that is a big benefit to us all. Our ‘library’ system is getting wider. There are more resources for us.
I don’t think it is bad for QDMA to evolve…..or for Google to do so. The result of their changing now gives me two websites. Two. Two accumulating and displaying the hands-on experiences of folks who have very similar interests as my own.
That’s not a bad thing.