I wonder how they know? I would assume it wasn’t world class Iowa soil but it’s definitely gotten worse just by virtue of erosion over the last four yearsIf it’s what I think it is, it lets you write off fertility loss. So if your fertility was poor when you bought, it’s not much help.
The Land podcast is sponsored by a similar group.
I think you have to have certified testing/documentation done when you acquire the property. It sounds to me a little like a timber basis.I wonder how they know? I would assume it wasn’t world class Iowa soil but it’s definitely gotten worse just by virtue of erosion over the last four years
This is a tax code thing, not a USDA or conservation program. Technically, there’s an inherent benefit to the owner from fertility increases from the objective increase in property values that come with it. This is a write off of an “expense” associated with production. It’s not anything that’s applicable to me, but the logic of it makes sense, I suppose.Why don't they have a program that rewards improving the soil? Your organic matter increased from 2 - 4%, nice management, here's your check. Is this just giving farmers a discount on land without incentivizing/requiring good management practices?
I probably don't understand it well enough to knock it. But it seems like its rewarding poor behavior and things should be set up the other way around.This is a tax code thing, not a USDA or conservation program. Technically, there’s an inherent benefit to the owner from fertility increases from the objective increase in property values that come with it. This is a write off of an “expense” associated with production. It’s not anything that’s applicable to me, but the logic of it makes sense, I suppose.
In some ways it's also promoting the conservation of mined resources like phosphorus and potassium that are mined to make fertilizer. I don't think it is necessarily promoting the draw down of nutrients, but compensating farmers for a depreciation in their asset when they otherwise would not have been.I probably don't understand it well enough to knock it. But it seems like its rewarding poor behavior and things should be set up the other way around.
Right.Nothing like the US tax code allowing you to depreciate an almost universally appreciating asset.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Soil fertility in production ag is universally appreciating?Nothing like the US tax code allowing you to depreciate an almost universally appreciating asset.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Soil fertility in production ag is universally appreciating?
Are farmers doing fertility tests to determine whether or not to buy a piece?