biglakeba$$
5 year old buck +
No idea. When I saw them huddled around the trucks sunday midday when I stopped in, just a lot of blank stares when I told them we saw a total of 6 deer for the weekend for 5 guys and we shot nothing.........
Hopefully you see 12 this year and they see 2.No idea. When I saw them huddled around the trucks sunday midday when I stopped in, just a lot of blank stares when I told them we saw a total of 6 deer for the weekend for 5 guys and we shot nothing.........
Jeff it sure is nice to see you back again. You always make me laugh. Looking forward to tomorrow night.I was just happy to be included. When it comes to deer management stuff, I'm like the fat/slow kid on the playground. You know.. the last one picked for the kick ball game. Picked right after the last girl and the kid that wears a helmet all day and talks to himself a lot. :D
I do not have much to add at this point however a couple quick comments.
(2) I personally do not feel we need to focus much on over browsing etc...we can include it in some statements but most landowners will not understand it. We might lose them in the details etc...
.
^^^^so you're gonna send Art all over the state? :D
I think site visits are good however I think to get the word out to the mass we need to put it into some kind of graphic that shows current state and then what over browsing looks like...demonstrate to them the difference and that their land can handle more deer.Long term I vision having many volunteers across the state who can do quick visits of interested landowners and show them the browse and explain what it means for balance. Have the landowner bring in 6 to 20 buddies and you can have an impact on the area.
If someone of repute came and said 'You can handle, house and annually harvest 2 - 3 times the deer here by doing this this and this...' you have now brought the message home to that parcel. It works. We are doing it on our cooperative.
We dont lose them in the details, we educate them on the details.
That sounds like a good idea, I would include a photo of what livable browsed understory would look like, in addition to the pics of unbrowsed and excessively damaged understory. You don't want to convey a message that the plants can't take any browsing, and that it is ok to have a % of the plants with bites taken from them. Cover all the bases, remember you will be dealing with many guys who will have no clue to start with. They may try to do some research online afterward and come across one of these "gloom and doom" tree hugging hippie forester types that will show a pic of a single trillium that has been eaten and claim that any deer browse is too much, you don't want them getting the wrong idea. Photos of similar plants would be more beneficial than just random pictures of a browse line on a bunch of random plants as well, to keep the browse comparisons easier to visually understand. Something along the lines of "Unbrowsed", "Acceptable Browse", "Overbrowsed" might be the ticket.I think site visits are good however I think to get the word out to the mass we need to put it into some kind of graphic that shows current state and then what over browsing looks like...demonstrate to them the difference and that their land can handle more deer.
I don't think that the average hunter or small property owner is going to grasp the concept of browsing/overbrowsing. I know you guys are talking about the browse species in the forest but I'd be concerned that your intended message is going to get transformed into; "What the hell, I can't grow a 1/2 acre of beans or plant any trees/shrubs/flowers without them getting destroyed, I must have too many deer".
I think the point is that you create that chance to speak with the use of posters and handouts with graphics like described above. Something on the lines of "Do the plants in your woods look like this?(unbrowsed) Or this?(acceptable browse) If they do you could easily increase the amount of deer using your property, if you would like to know how, let's talk!I think you create a chance to speak with a dozen or more guys who WILL have questions that will not be answered with 4 or 5 pictures online.
Growth will involve personal appearances, print, and site visits.
Until you bring it home to a guys parcel, it won't sink in. And its a tremendous opportunity t have a real impact. From experience.
I think the point is that you create that chance to speak with the use of posters and handouts with graphics like described above. Something on the lines of "Do the plants in your woods look like this?(unbrowsed) Or this?(acceptable browse) If they do you could easily increase the amount of deer using your property, if you would like to know how, let's talk!
I agree that onsite visits are the preferred method how I just feel we do not have the manpower to pull this off.
How are you going to get them (majority of hunters are not into habitat like us) to attend these workshops? I agree we need to find local leaders to spearhead these efforts however I still think we need to get the attention of hunters first and than one of the take homes would be a field day. I work a lot with farmers across the state on implementing N BMPs and whenever we want to truly get change done on the local level you need to find "The Man" for that area that all the area farmers respect and listen to. If you get his attention and he is onboard then the rest will follow. How do we find or empower "The Man" in all these various areas?I'd be more than willing to participate in a number of "work days" or whatever we want to call them...much, much, much happier than spending hours and hours planning and prepping for a banquet :rolleyes:
I agree that onsite visits are the preferred method how I just feel we do not have the manpower to pull this off. I also think we need to create outreach materials to open the door so these guys invite us out.
Doing habitat projects and food plots/fruit trees needs to be part of the message in having a more enjoyable hunt and holding more deer. Why can't we sell this message? Somebody was responsible for all of us getting into the whole habitat game and I seriously doubt someone would say that it hasn't added enjoyment to the hunt.
I'm a bit surprised that some of the deer groups out there haven't been promoting the habitat/food plot movement. I would think they would be in a position to have seminars and seed giveaways. It could possibly lead to more membership interest for them as well.
How are you going to get them (majority of hunters are not into habitat like us) to attend these workshops? I agree we need to find local leaders to spearhead these efforts however I still think we need to get the attention of hunters first and than one of the take homes would be a field day.
I think guys are completely in the dark on everything we talk of here, and in moderation it can help the 'average' deer hunter. When on site its fairly easy to make some of these suggestions, but they don't have to be crazy time intensive. Access is a major factor, and some level of sanctuary a close second to housing more deer.
But we are all on this forum because we needed answers to a problem we had, and its similar to what he hunters of MN face right now.
I believe the man to be Sportsmans Clubs, MDHA chapters, QDMA chapters. 20 minute powerpoint, 30 minute Q&A followed by a field day activity inspecting browse on a local property and starting the ball rolling.
A 'trained' guy on hand with browse experience who is a third party with credentials makes the event work.