before I used cell cams, i was exactly like farmlegend in regards to checking my cams. I'd never drive anything motorized in my hunting area tho! Once I had about 10 non-cell cams out, it would take me a couple of hours to hit them all, swapping cards.
I hated that, because no matter how hard I prepped, I was still attracting attention to the cams spending that much time in the area. Scent free as I could be, nitrile gloves, sneaking in/out, hot gluing leaves/branches to the cams to hide them, etc...imo, it was all futile. Deer found the cams every single time, I COULD NOT FOOL THEM, 100%. The closest I could get to hiding the cams was to mount the cams high, like at least 8 ft. However, the detection slot gets pretty small the higher you go.
That's why I went to the cuddelink system. I didn't even do the cell feature for the first year. I had the home unit where I parked my truck, and then I had to only pull one card, and spend an hour in my truck on a laptop checking it all out. It was a supreme bonus of not stomping up my hunting area like I did all the years past.
Because it bugged me to have to pack my laptop with me when I hunted. I went to the cell feature the next year, and I'm satisfied with how it all works now.
I've mentioned this before, prob in this thread, but there's a pretty cool video of a guy who uses a drone to cover a 300+ acre hunting area. They did a test where they mounted 5 cams in a pentagon configuration, about 150-200yds apart. The guy monitors the entire property with a drone, all day, and maps the deer activity in relation to where the cams were located. His results were something like this: he'd count the number of deer within picture taking distance from each cam, and what his results revealed was the cams only took pics of about 20% of the opportunities when the deer were within picture taking distance. Some deer were behind the cam, some ran by the cam, some were in front of the cam, but somehow the pic never took. His study has too many variables to consider it completely solid, but, it was very surprising to me that those 5 cams only had a 20% success rate of taking a pic.