He is arguing his case under the constitution of the state of Louisiana which lists property as one of the items protected against unreasonable search or seizure, according to the article.
What in this incident makes this guy a hunter? At no time do they say he was hunting, but they still refer to him as a hunter repeatedly. The only thing they list is that he had purchased fishing and hunting licenses previously. If he made himself a pot of coffee in the morning would they call...
My point is that codifying what is happening so that you can call it legal, and then allocating funds to support it, does nothing to solve the problem. If anything, it makes it worse, because once government has something they are quite reluctant to let it go.
I guess I just disagree with your assessment of the war funding bill that had some immigration stuff in it. It basically made legal what was already happening and supplied more funding. That is not fixing the problem, in my opinion.
In Minnesota, you can discharge a firearm anywhere on a WMA unless specifically prohibited on that WMA. The 500 foot setback does not apply to WMA's in Minnesota.
If you own the land, and are not restricted by other governmental regulations, you can discharge a firearm anywhere on your property in the state of Minnesota.
I will freely admit that I have not seen them firsthand. I was told about their existence by a student at the school. Not as reputable a source as the Internet, but good enough for me.
Do you put any stock in the claims behind quenching? Have you done any comparisons? I have mostly just used the wood chips from my smoker, then charge with castings or clean urine.
My squash has kept much longer over the winter since I've started adding biochar to my garden.