yoderjac
5 year old buck +
I tubed and caged a few crabs last year. Partly because I was too lazy to build all the required window screens to protect 24 trees and partially because I wanted to experiment with the growth of a tubed vs. non tubed tree.
I plan to remove those tubes this year and will take more precise notes but during my early March trip I didn't notice dramatic difference with growth between my tubed and non tubed trees.
One year, I used short tubes on seedlings. Because the tubes warmed faster, the first issue was lots of water sprouts in the tube below the graft before the tree pushed any buds above the tube. The second issue was powdery mildew. We have wet springs here. That may not be an issue in other climates. I ended up with the powdery mildew starting in the tub and them moving to other parts of the tree.
Just like with other trees, tubes can cause problems sometimes depending on conditions and be beneficial in other cases depending on conditions. For me, the only benefit that outweighs down sides is protection from deer at low cost (money and time) relative to caging. Since apples are so prone to disease and insect to start with I no longer use them, even on crabs that are general somewhat less prone than most domestic apples.
If I had caging, I would not risk using tubes since the protection benefit has been met by caging. I did not use window screen at first. Since I've been using quarry stone over landscape material as mulch, I've only had one trunk nibbled on and that tree recovered. I'm now using window screen but I'm in no rush to get it on the trees already in the field.
Thanks,
Jack