What you see in the OP above is an extremely expensive, short term alternative to actual ag lime application. It MAY give you a quicker response, but it is also a very, very short lived and overall expensive solution to a problem that nothing more than a good quality soil test, the application of proper amounts of ag lime, and time will take care of the "right" way. 2 gallons of liquid lime cannot contain any more than 2 gallons of Ca(with the water to hold it in suspension, it obviously would be much less than the whole of the 2 gallons, but you get my meaning), as no one has yet come up with a method to stuff 10 gallons of $h!t in a 5 gallon bucket. When your soil test calls for 2 tons of lime, you must put on the equivalent of 2 tons of lime and you can't get that in 2 gallons of anything. Not to mention the fact that you might be paying for all those micronutrients that your soil may or may not need, no way to know any of that unless you have micros included in your soil testing and most guys don't do that for food plot purposes. If you did, and you needed to add the micros, you would have an accurate amount of each to add, and would not be paying for extra stuff you do not need. Also take into consideration that most micro recommendations are a few pounds(or more) per acre. How many pounds of each of those "52 micronutrients" do you think are in 1 gallon of that liquid? We all know that water is around 8.3 lbs/gal, milk is more dense at about 8.6 lbs/gal, and gas is less dense at about 6.3. That said, to get any appreciable, useful amounts of micronutrients in that gallon jug, it would have to weigh somewhere in the range of 100+ lbs. A gallon of mercury weighs around 113 lbs, I doubt this is anywhere close to that.