No doubt those residential lots would have contributed more to the local tax base than some deer hunting ground if taxes are in fact the argument being made.
Garage side was poured on Wednesday. Glad to have all the difficult concrete done. Time to take a break for a couple months and gather materials. Going vertical in the spring.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m only speaking to Kansas. And I need to be clear. Anyone exercising their right to the law as it currently exists is good in my book. I think there are ways they can improve and those are my thoughts. We don’t have to agree. I am the County Appraiser here so I can speak very specifically to...
Assuming he is a Kansas resident, there would be that. Again, there are more taxes than the tiny amount of property tax someone pays on ag ground in Kansas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very few. They lease it all out. They maximize their income that way and that’s cool. We are all less neighborly now because of it too. It is what it is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, here we have representatives who work for the farm and insurance lobby and those who don’t. I get to vote on that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I also don’t know about the local economy stimulation. Let’s say I am Billy Bob. About 90% of the reason I am still in Kansas is the hunting. As that continues to get worse, I am considering moving out of state and only returning to hunt. Is that a net positive to lose my 365 spending with about...
I mentioned this like 100 posts ago, but a hunter who replaces 4 other hunters by hunting 5 states means we lose 4 hunters nationally. That is a problem. When a guy from New Jersey buys that Kansas 80 to ensure he gets a tag, Kansas loses a hunter with a vote. Eventually we don’t have enough...