Sure:
http://www.habitat-talk.com/index.php?threads/bow-question.5992/
But when it comes to structuring a forum it is important not to get too much dilution. I've noticed that some new forums create a structure with individual forums for a very broad variety of topics in an attempt to attract more members. What tends to happen is that while the forum initially gets more members, those members are diluted across more forums. The activity on any individual forum or subject is decreases and the forum loses critical mass and eventually dwindles.
One of the many reasons I chose this forum is because of the focus. I think that is an asset. The smart way to broaden a forum is to do it slowly based on use. In other words, when the admin sees lots of threads on the general discussion forum focusing around a particular topic, say bowhunting, then it is time to open a specific thread.
A well established forum doesn't have that risk but doesn't benefit much from too much breadth. For example, a few users asked for a specific habitat-food plot forum on the Chasingame forum. It is a very well established forum focused primarily on trail cameras. The admin accommodated and in 4 years there have been 102 threads on it. Similarly, while use much more than this example, QDMA had a trail camera forum, which had very small traffic compared to Chasingame.
Folks will always go to a site where the forum is focuses in their primary interest area for a particular topic. Bowsite and Archery-talk or similar forums will always attract the majority of bowhunting questions.
That doesn't mean forum users here should hesitate to ask archery questions here, as folks say, there are plenty of experienced folks willing to help. I just means that the forum is better off for now while it is young with those occurring in general discussion in my opinion.
Thanks,
Jack